INTM vs. SCMB
INTM (Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. INTM is actively managed, while SCMB is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTM charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.
Performance
INTM vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTM achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.15% return.
INTM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTM vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.82% | 4.72% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 1.15% | 5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTM and SCMB is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTM vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank
INTM
SCMB
INTM vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTM | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.05 | 0.98 | +2.07 |
Drawdowns
INTM vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTM drawdown since its inception was -2.65%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTM and SCMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTM | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -6.13% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.79% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -1.32% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility
INTM vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTM | SCMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 2.94% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 4.16% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.53% | 4.16% | -1.63% |
INTM vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTM vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison
INTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than SCMB's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF | 2.62% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.53% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTM and SCMB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for INTM.
SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.62% for INTM.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for INTM and 0.03% for SCMB.
Find the right allocation for INTM and SCMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer