PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTL vs. BUYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INTL vs. BUYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main International ETF (INTL) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than BUYW's 3.39% return.


INTL

1D
-1.27%
1M
3.36%
YTD
11.21%
6M
13.45%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
10Y*

BUYW

1D
0.35%
1M
0.99%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.27%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL vs. BUYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
INTL
Main International ETF
11.21%29.55%2.00%18.20%-2.66%
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
3.39%9.08%9.82%12.80%-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL and BUYW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2022

0.50

INTL vs. BUYW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INTL
BUYW

Financial Services

23.7%
15.3%

Technology

15.3%
24.0%

Industrials

15.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

9.1%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
6.4%

Healthcare

6.5%
13.0%

Energy

6.1%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
3.2%

Communication Services

5.0%
16.9%

Utilities

3.3%
1.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.0%

Financial Services

INTL
23.7%
BUYW
15.3%

Technology

INTL
15.3%
BUYW
24.0%

Industrials

INTL
15.1%
BUYW
4.4%

Basic Materials

INTL
9.1%
BUYW
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

INTL
8.0%
BUYW
6.4%

Healthcare

INTL
6.5%
BUYW
13.0%

Energy

INTL
6.1%
BUYW
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

INTL
5.6%
BUYW
3.2%

Communication Services

INTL
5.0%
BUYW
16.9%

Utilities

INTL
3.3%
BUYW
1.3%

Real Estate

INTL
2.2%
BUYW
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTL vs. BUYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTL
INTL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
INTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
INTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BUYW
BUYW Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BUYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUYW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BUYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUYW Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL vs. BUYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main International ETF (INTL) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTLBUYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.79

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

20.24

-10.79

INTL vs. BUYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BUYW Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL and BUYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTLBUYWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.03

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.17

-0.11

Drawdowns

INTL vs. BUYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, which is greater than BUYW's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL and BUYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTLBUYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.48%

-9.36%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-2.59%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-9.36%

-5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-0.21%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-0.61%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

0.48%

+2.43%

Volatility

INTL vs. BUYW - Volatility Comparison

Main International ETF (INTL) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) at 1.02%. This indicates that INTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTLBUYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

1.02%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

4.03%

+9.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

4.85%

+10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

8.47%

+7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

8.47%

+7.03%

INTL vs. BUYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYW's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

INTL vs. BUYW - Dividend Comparison

INTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than BUYW's 5.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUYW
Main Buywrite ETF
5.91%5.89%5.93%5.95%0.50%
INTL
Main International ETF
2.31%2.57%2.71%2.86%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


INTL and BUYW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTL has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to BUYW (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTL dropped -14.48% vs BUYW's -9.36%.

On 3-year performance, INTL leads with 17.19% vs 8.73% for BUYW. On fees, INTL is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, BUYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, INTL has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INTL is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.

BUYW has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 2.31% for INTL.

INTL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUYW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for INTL and 1.29% for BUYW.

BUYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTL and BUYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer