INTL vs. BUYW
INTL (Main International ETF) and BUYW (Main Buywrite ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INTL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Main Funds, while BUYW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Main Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, INTL returned 17.19%/yr vs 8.73%/yr for BUYW. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTL charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for BUYW.
Performance
INTL vs. BUYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTL achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than BUYW's 3.39% return.
INTL
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 6M
- 13.45%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUYW
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 9.76%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTL vs. BUYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTL Main International ETF | 11.21% | 29.55% | 2.00% | 18.20% | -2.66% |
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF | 3.39% | 9.08% | 9.82% | 12.80% | -0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTL and BUYW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2022 | 0.50 |
INTL vs. BUYW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INTL
BUYW
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
INTL
BUYW
Technology
INTL
BUYW
Industrials
INTL
BUYW
Basic Materials
INTL
BUYW
Consumer Cyclical
INTL
BUYW
Healthcare
INTL
BUYW
Energy
INTL
BUYW
Consumer Defensive
INTL
BUYW
Communication Services
INTL
BUYW
Utilities
INTL
BUYW
Real Estate
INTL
BUYW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTL vs. BUYW — Risk / Return Rank
INTL
BUYW
INTL vs. BUYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main International ETF (INTL) and Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTL | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.79 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 20.24 | -10.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTL | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.03 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
INTL vs. BUYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTL drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, which is greater than BUYW's maximum drawdown of -9.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL and BUYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTL | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.48% | -9.36% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.51% | -2.59% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -9.36% | -5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.21% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -0.61% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 0.48% | +2.43% |
Volatility
INTL vs. BUYW - Volatility Comparison
Main International ETF (INTL) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Main Buywrite ETF (BUYW) at 1.02%. This indicates that INTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTL | BUYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 1.02% | +4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.08% | 4.03% | +9.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 4.85% | +10.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 8.47% | +7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 8.47% | +7.03% |
INTL vs. BUYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
INTL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BUYW's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
INTL vs. BUYW - Dividend Comparison
INTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than BUYW's 5.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUYW Main Buywrite ETF | 5.91% | 5.89% | 5.93% | 5.95% | 0.50% |
INTL Main International ETF | 2.31% | 2.57% | 2.71% | 2.86% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INTL and BUYW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTL has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to BUYW (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTL dropped -14.48% vs BUYW's -9.36%.
On 3-year performance, INTL leads with 17.19% vs 8.73% for BUYW. On fees, INTL is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, BUYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, INTL has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INTL is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BUYW.
BUYW has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 2.31% for INTL.
INTL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUYW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for INTL and 1.29% for BUYW.
BUYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTL and BUYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer