INTL.L vs. ZINC.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INTL.L (WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and ZINC.L (WisdomTree Zinc) are both exchange-traded funds - INTL.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ZINC.L is a Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Zinc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INTL.L returned 17.40%/yr vs 7.11%/yr for ZINC.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INTL.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ZINC.L.

Performance

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

INTL.L is traded in GBp, while ZINC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ZINC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTL.L achieves a 50.10% return, which is significantly higher than ZINC.L's 16.92% return.

INTL.L

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 25.51%
• YTD: 50.10%
• 6M: 51.64%
• 1Y: 96.68%
• 3Y*: 31.07%
• 5Y*: 17.40%
• 10Y*: —

ZINC.L

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 8.53%
• YTD: 16.92%
• 6M: 18.34%
• 1Y: 40.25%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 8.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
INTL.L WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc	50.10%	14.50%	13.58%	48.71%	-35.12%	17.36%	68.98%	32.12%
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc	16.92%	-0.90%	15.08%	-13.56%	-0.50%	27.85%	12.33%	-8.37%

Correlation

The correlation between INTL.L and ZINC.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2019	0.21

The correlation between INTL.L and ZINC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (5 years) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTL.L

INTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
INTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
INTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
INTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
INTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
INTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ZINC.L

ZINC.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
ZINC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ZINC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ZINC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ZINC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ZINC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INTL.L	ZINC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.85	2.19	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.47	3.01	+1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.36	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.37	4.44	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.68	16.78	+2.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the ZINC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTL.L and ZINC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INTL.L	ZINC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85	2.19	+1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.29	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.04	+0.91

Drawdowns

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, smaller than the maximum ZINC.L drawdown of -63.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTL.L and ZINC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTL.L	ZINC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.71%	-63.23%	+25.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.10%	-9.03%	-6.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.54%	-23.08%	-10.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.92%	-44.66%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-13.63%	+13.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.00%	-33.41%	+22.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.90%	2.38%	+2.52%

Volatility

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF - USD Acc (INTL.L) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) at 5.50%. This indicates that INTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INTL.L	ZINC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.73%	5.50%	+4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.45%	14.37%	+4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.03%	18.33%	+6.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.61%	24.32%	+1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	24.05%	+2.24%

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INTL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZINC.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

INTL.L vs. ZINC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither INTL.L nor ZINC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INTL.L and ZINC.L in my portfolio?

INTL.L and ZINC.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, INTL.L or ZINC.L?

On fees, INTL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, INTL.L or ZINC.L?

INTL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ZINC.L.

What is the main difference between INTL.L and ZINC.L?

INTL.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while ZINC.L is Metals. INTL.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for INTL.L and 0.49% for ZINC.L.