INTC vs. PM
INTC (Intel Corporation) and PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) are both stocks. INTC operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while PM operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, INTC returned 17.03%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for PM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INTC vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTC achieves a 237.59% return, which is significantly higher than PM's 15.93% return. Over the past 10 years, INTC has outperformed PM with an annualized return of 17.03%, while PM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.
INTC
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 14.53%
- YTD
- 237.59%
- 6M
- 229.46%
- 1Y
- 518.52%
- 3Y*
- 55.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- 17.03%
PM
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 31.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
INTC vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | 237.59% | 84.04% | -59.57% | 94.56% | -46.64% | 6.05% | -14.69% | 30.71% | 4.23% | 30.87% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 15.93% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTC and PM is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008 | 0.24 |
The correlation between INTC and PM shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
INTC:
$633.19B
PM:
$288.03B
INTC:
-$0.67
PM:
$7.12
INTC:
10.91
PM:
6.93
INTC:
$53.76B
PM:
$41.49B
INTC:
$19.05B
PM:
$27.93B
INTC:
$8.83B
PM:
$17.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTC vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank
INTC
PM
INTC vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intel Corporation (INTC) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INTC | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.05 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 20.85 | 0.18 | +20.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 48.84 | 0.34 | +48.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INTC vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTC drawdown since its inception was -82.25%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTC and PM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTC | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.25% | -42.87% | -39.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.17% | -20.64% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.80% | -20.64% | -43.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.53% | -22.78% | -42.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.80% | -42.87% | -27.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -3.94% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.66% | -10.02% | -26.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.30% | 10.81% | -0.51% |
Volatility
INTC vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
Intel Corporation (INTC) has a higher volatility of 24.56% compared to Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) at 7.76%. This indicates that INTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTC | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.56% | 7.76% | +16.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.47% | 21.07% | +37.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.69% | 27.73% | +45.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.29% | 22.73% | +29.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 24.46% | +19.74% |
Dividends
INTC vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTC Intel Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.87% | 1.47% | 5.52% | 2.70% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 2.56% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.79% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.13% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
Financials
INTC vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intel Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INTC vs. PM - Profitability Comparison
INTC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.35B and revenue of 13.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.91B and revenue of 10.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.
INTC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported an operating income of -3.14B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.1%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.89B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.
INTC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intel Corporation reported a net income of -3.73B and revenue of 13.58B, resulting in a net margin of -27.5%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.44B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTC and PM have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTC has higher volatility (24.56%) compared to PM (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTC dropped -82.25% vs PM's -42.87%.
INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.84 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTC and PM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer