INTA vs. ALKT
INTA (Intapp, Inc.) and ALKT (Alkami Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, INTA returned -18.05%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for ALKT. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
INTA vs. ALKT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INTA achieves a -47.14% return, which is significantly lower than ALKT's -31.30% return.
INTA
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -47.14%
- 6M
- -43.86%
- 1Y
- -58.41%
- 3Y*
- -18.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALKT
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -11.80%
- YTD
- -31.30%
- 6M
- -25.76%
- 1Y
- -47.96%
- 3Y*
- 1.07%
- 5Y*
- -13.07%
- 10Y*
- —
INTA vs. ALKT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTA Intapp, Inc. | -47.14% | -28.51% | 68.57% | 52.45% | -0.87% | -10.14% |
ALKT Alkami Technology, Inc. | -31.30% | -37.10% | 51.26% | 66.21% | -27.27% | -43.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between INTA and ALKT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
INTA:
$1.91B
ALKT:
$1.69B
INTA:
-$0.48
ALKT:
-$0.48
INTA:
3.49
ALKT:
3.51
INTA:
5.97
ALKT:
4.55
INTA:
$554.34M
ALKT:
$471.94M
INTA:
$415.89M
ALKT:
$272.71M
INTA:
-$30.20M
ALKT:
-$17.46M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INTA vs. ALKT — Risk / Return Rank
INTA
ALKT
INTA vs. ALKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intapp, Inc. (INTA) and Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INTA | ALKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.84 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.95 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -1.45 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INTA | ALKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | -0.95 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | -0.36 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
INTA vs. ALKT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INTA drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, smaller than the maximum ALKT drawdown of -79.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTA and ALKT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INTA | ALKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.17% | -79.03% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.17% | -50.50% | -16.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.17% | -63.88% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.31% | -66.76% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.11% | -52.41% | +21.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.43% | 33.16% | +8.27% |
Volatility
INTA vs. ALKT - Volatility Comparison
Intapp, Inc. (INTA) has a higher volatility of 22.95% compared to Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) at 13.93%. This indicates that INTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INTA | ALKT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.95% | 13.93% | +9.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.43% | 37.49% | +9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.94% | 50.76% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.55% | 48.13% | +6.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.55% | 48.72% | +5.83% |
Dividends
INTA vs. ALKT - Dividend Comparison
Neither INTA nor ALKT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
INTA vs. ALKT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intapp, Inc. and Alkami Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
INTA vs. ALKT - Profitability Comparison
INTA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.51M and revenue of 146.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.7%.
ALKT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkami Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 73.87M and revenue of 126.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.6%.
INTA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported an operating income of -14.25M and revenue of 146.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -9.8%.
ALKT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkami Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.71M and revenue of 126.14M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.5%.
INTA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intapp, Inc. reported a net income of -15.50M and revenue of 146.04M, resulting in a net margin of -10.6%.
ALKT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alkami Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -9.96M and revenue of 126.14M, resulting in a net margin of -7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
INTA and ALKT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTA has higher volatility (22.95%) compared to ALKT (13.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTA dropped -74.17% vs ALKT's -79.03%.
ALKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.95 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INTA and ALKT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer