INSAX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
INSAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 29, 2011. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
INSAX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INSAX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSAX Catalyst Insider Buying Fund | -15.16% | 15.39% | 23.86% | 31.44% | -32.65% | -17.65% | 14.36% | 23.91% | -2.91% | 0.06% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INSAX achieves a -15.16% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
INSAX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -11.27%
- YTD
- -15.16%
- 6M
- -20.34%
- 1Y
- 0.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- -1.01%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INSAX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
INSAX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INSAX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
INSAX
SWLGX
INSAX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INSAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 0.66 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.24 | 1.10 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.15 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.72 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 2.51 | -2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INSAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.66 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.56 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.68 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between INSAX and SWLGX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
INSAX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
INSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSAX Catalyst Insider Buying Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% |
Drawdowns
INSAX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INSAX drawdown since its inception was -59.24%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INSAX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INSAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.24% | -32.69% | -26.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.44% | -16.16% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.26% | -32.69% | -24.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.44% | -16.16% | -7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -7.13% | -6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.53% | 4.62% | +3.91% |
Volatility
INSAX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Insider Buying Fund (INSAX) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that INSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INSAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 5.38% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.82% | 11.82% | +11.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.27% | 22.31% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.81% | 21.47% | +8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.98% | 22.78% | +3.20% |