PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INRO vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INRO vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INRO achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 19.56% return.


INRO

1D
-0.65%
1M
6.39%
YTD
13.22%
6M
13.14%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLCR

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.16%
YTD
19.56%
6M
21.53%
1Y
47.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INRO vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
INRO
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF
13.22%16.67%10.88%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
19.56%30.93%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between INRO and BLCR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024

0.91

The correlation between INRO and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

INRO vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INRO
BLCR

Technology

38.4%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
10.9%

Communication Services

10.4%
11.0%

Financial Services

10.1%
12.1%

Industrials

9.7%
13.5%

Healthcare

7.9%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Energy

3.7%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Utilities

0.0%
1.6%

Technology

INRO
38.4%
BLCR
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

INRO
11.3%
BLCR
10.9%

Communication Services

INRO
10.4%
BLCR
11.0%

Financial Services

INRO
10.1%
BLCR
12.1%

Industrials

INRO
9.7%
BLCR
13.5%

Healthcare

INRO
7.9%
BLCR
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

INRO
6.4%
BLCR

-

Energy

INRO
3.7%
BLCR
2.2%

Basic Materials

INRO
1.5%
BLCR
2.2%

Real Estate

INRO
0.6%
BLCR

-

Utilities

INRO
0.0%
BLCR
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INRO vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INRO
INRO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
INRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
INRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INRO vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INROBLCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.52

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

4.61

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.71

21.86

-6.15

INRO vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INRO and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INROBLCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

3.05

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

1.90

-0.77

Drawdowns

INRO vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INRO drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRO and BLCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INROBLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-21.29%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-10.26%

+0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.37%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-2.19%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.16%

-0.15%

Volatility

INRO vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF (INRO) is 3.69%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that INRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INROBLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

4.45%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

12.24%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

15.54%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

17.47%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

17.47%

-0.37%

INRO vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

INRO has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

INRO vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

INRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.23%0.33%0.75%0.13%
INRO
Blackrock U.S. Industry Rotation ETF
0.65%0.68%0.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, INRO and BLCR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BLCR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to INRO (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INRO dropped -20.02% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 47.09% vs 31.46% for INRO. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, INRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 47.09% return vs 31.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for INRO.

INRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.

Their fees differ too: 0.42% for INRO and 0.36% for BLCR.

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INRO and BLCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer