INRL.L vs. XCX5.L
INRL.L (Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both India Equities funds tracking the MSCI India NR USD, from Amundi and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INRL.L returned 6.20%/yr vs 6.39%/yr for XCX5.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INRL.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with INRL.L having a -10.19% return and XCX5.L slightly lower at -10.21%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with INRL.L having a 6.20% annualized return and XCX5.L not far ahead at 6.39%.
INRL.L
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -8.25%
- YTD
- -10.19%
- 1Y
- -12.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRL.L Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) | -10.19% | -5.74% | 11.19% | 12.56% | 1.46% | 25.81% | 9.68% | 2.69% | -3.77% | 24.93% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -10.21% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | -3.56% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRL.L and XCX5.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between INRL.L and XCX5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Industrials
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Energy
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Basic Materials
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Technology
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Healthcare
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Defensive
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Communication Services
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Utilities
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Real Estate
INRL.L
XCX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
INRL.L
XCX5.L
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INRL.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.89 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.62 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | -1.24 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRL.L drawdown since its inception was -72.96%, which is greater than XCX5.L's maximum drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRL.L and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRL.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.96% | -41.66% | -31.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | -19.88% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | -26.47% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -26.47% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.58% | -37.35% | -0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.54% | -20.86% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.26% | -12.20% | -4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.08% | 9.87% | +0.21% |
Volatility
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) is 4.19%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that INRL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRL.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 4.49% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | 13.75% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 16.29% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 21.22% | -5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 22.11% | -2.40% |
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRL.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRL.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither INRL.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, INRL.L and XCX5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XCX5.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCX5.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INRL.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INRL.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for INRL.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer