INRL.L vs. CI2G.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L).
INRL.L and CI2G.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INRL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Nov 7, 2006. CI2G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both INRL.L and CI2G.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: INRL.L or CI2G.L.
Key characteristics
| INRL.L | CI2G.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.39% | 17.85% |
| 1Y Return | 25.45% | 26.21% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.58% | 10.80% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.06% | 13.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.69 | 1.76 |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.83% | 14.62% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.58% | -37.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.16% | -2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRL.L and CI2G.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
INRL.L vs. CI2G.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INRL.L having a 17.39% return and CI2G.L slightly higher at 17.85%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INRL.L vs. CI2G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRL.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CI2G.L's 0.80% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
INRL.L vs. CI2G.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
INRL.L vs. CI2G.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither INRL.L nor CI2G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
INRL.L vs. CI2G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INRL.L drawdown since its inception was -37.58%, roughly equal to the maximum CI2G.L drawdown of -37.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRL.L and CI2G.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
INRL.L vs. CI2G.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.