INRL.L vs. MWRD.L
INRL.L (Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - INRL.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INRL.L charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.
Performance
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INRL.L
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -12.50%
- 6M
- -13.28%
- 1Y
- -12.78%
- 3Y*
- 1.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
MWRD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INRL.L Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) | -12.50% | -5.74% | 11.19% | 12.56% | 1.46% | 25.81% | 9.68% | 2.69% | -3.77% | 10.65% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | -1.27% | 17.50% | -9.18% | 24.39% | 11.85% | 23.29% | -4.10% | 6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between INRL.L and MWRD.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.44 |
The correlation between INRL.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Industrials
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Energy
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Basic Materials
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Technology
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Healthcare
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Communication Services
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Utilities
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Real Estate
INRL.L
MWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
INRL.L
MWRD.L
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INRL.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INRL.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | — | — |
Drawdowns
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INRL.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.57% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.97% | — | — |
Volatility
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INRL.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | — | — |
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
INRL.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
INRL.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither INRL.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
INRL.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INRL.L.
INRL.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. INRL.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INRL.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for INRL.L and MWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer