PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INRL.L vs. IIND.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

INRL.L is traded in GBp, while IIND.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IIND.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INRL.L achieves a -10.19% return, which is significantly lower than IIND.L's -9.63% return.


INRL.L

1D
0.88%
1M
-1.58%
6M
-8.25%
YTD
-10.19%
1Y
-12.59%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
6.20%

IIND.L

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.45%
6M
-7.85%
YTD
-9.63%
1Y
-10.85%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INRL.L
Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)
-10.19%-5.74%11.19%12.56%1.46%25.81%9.68%2.69%3.65%
IIND.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-9.63%-2.94%11.13%12.43%2.72%26.95%10.48%3.72%-21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between INRL.L and IIND.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2018

0.97

The correlation between INRL.L and IIND.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INRL.L
IIND.L

Financial Services

28.3%
30.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
12.3%

Industrials

10.7%
10.4%

Energy

9.0%
8.8%

Basic Materials

8.4%
8.3%

Technology

8.2%
6.9%

Healthcare

6.3%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
5.7%

Communication Services

4.7%
5.0%

Utilities

4.5%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.4%

Financial Services

INRL.L
28.3%
IIND.L
30.7%

Consumer Cyclical

INRL.L
12.5%
IIND.L
12.3%

Industrials

INRL.L
10.7%
IIND.L
10.4%

Energy

INRL.L
9.0%
IIND.L
8.8%

Basic Materials

INRL.L
8.4%
IIND.L
8.3%

Technology

INRL.L
8.2%
IIND.L
6.9%

Healthcare

INRL.L
6.3%
IIND.L
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

INRL.L
6.0%
IIND.L
5.7%

Communication Services

INRL.L
4.7%
IIND.L
5.0%

Utilities

INRL.L
4.5%
IIND.L
4.2%

Real Estate

INRL.L
1.4%
IIND.L
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INRL.L vs. IIND.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INRL.L
INRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
INRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
INRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
INRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
INRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

IIND.L
IIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INRL.LIIND.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.90

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

-0.55

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

-1.09

-0.16

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INRL.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is comparable to the IIND.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INRL.L and IIND.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INRL.L drawdown since its inception was -72.96%, which is greater than IIND.L's maximum drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INRL.L and IIND.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INRL.LIIND.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.96%

-45.07%

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.97%

-19.76%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.82%

-24.81%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-24.81%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.54%

-18.89%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.26%

-13.09%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.08%

9.98%

+0.10%

Volatility

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) have volatilities of 4.19% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INRL.LIIND.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

4.24%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

13.77%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

16.20%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

21.38%

-5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

24.90%

-5.19%

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

INRL.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IIND.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

INRL.L vs. IIND.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither INRL.L nor IIND.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, INRL.L and IIND.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IIND.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IIND.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INRL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INRL.L and 0.65% for IIND.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INRL.L and IIND.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer