PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INPP.L vs. GCP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INPP.L vs. GCP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in International Public Partnership (INPP.L) and GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with INPP.L having a 16.88% return and GCP.L slightly lower at 16.21%. Over the past 10 years, INPP.L has outperformed GCP.L with an annualized return of 4.47%, while GCP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.37% annualized return.


INPP.L

1D
0.28%
1M
0.85%
6M
13.09%
YTD
16.88%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
4.47%
ALL TIME*
7.30%

GCP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.83%
6M
17.95%
YTD
16.21%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
3.37%
ALL TIME*
6.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INPP.L vs. GCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INPP.L
International Public Partnership
16.88%10.96%-5.78%-3.94%-6.43%4.41%6.91%13.86%2.42%6.81%
GCP.L
GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited
16.21%15.63%7.89%-22.98%0.44%6.30%-11.70%9.93%5.00%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between INPP.L and GCP.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2010

0.29

The correlation between INPP.L and GCP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INPP.L:

£2.56B

GCP.L:

£650.01M

Total Revenue (TTM)

INPP.L:

£218.94M

GCP.L:

£171.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INPP.L:

£218.94M

GCP.L:

£97.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

INPP.L:

£16.12M

GCP.L:

£45.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INPP.L vs. GCP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INPP.L
INPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
INPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
INPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
INPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
INPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GCP.L
GCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INPP.L vs. GCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Public Partnership (INPP.L) and GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INPP.LGCP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

1.96

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

3.82

+5.05

INPP.L vs. GCP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the GCP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INPP.L and GCP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INPP.L vs. GCP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INPP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.01%, smaller than the maximum GCP.L drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPP.L and GCP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INPP.LGCP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.01%

-44.22%

+17.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-9.25%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.28%

-23.14%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.01%

-44.22%

+17.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.01%

-44.22%

+17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.55%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-7.93%

+2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

4.75%

-2.23%

Volatility

INPP.L vs. GCP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for International Public Partnership (INPP.L) is 2.96%, while GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that INPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INPP.LGCP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

4.80%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

11.15%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

14.76%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

20.14%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

20.66%

-3.74%

Dividends

INPP.L vs. GCP.L - Dividend Comparison

INPP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, less than GCP.L's 8.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCP.L
GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited
8.48%9.41%9.89%9.72%6.86%6.46%6.97%5.77%5.97%5.89%6.18%6.33%
INPP.L
International Public Partnership
6.06%6.77%6.81%5.77%5.04%4.40%4.28%4.26%4.52%4.31%4.29%4.61%

Financials

INPP.L vs. GCP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Public Partnership and GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
158.00M
49.13M
(INPP.L) Total Revenue
(GCP.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBP except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


INPP.L and GCP.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INPP.L and GCP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer