GCP.L vs. SEITX
Compare and contrast key facts about GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) and SEI Institutional International Trust International Equity Fund (SEITX).
SEITX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Dec 20, 1989.
Performance
GCP.L vs. SEITX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCP.L vs. SEITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCP.L GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited | 0.40% | 15.63% | 7.90% | -22.98% | 0.44% | 6.30% | -11.70% | 9.93% | 5.00% | 11.41% |
SEITX SEI Institutional International Trust International Equity Fund | 4.97% | 27.16% | 8.57% | 12.24% | -5.98% | 11.14% | 8.09% | 17.76% | -11.78% | 15.71% |
Different Trading Currencies
GCP.L is traded in GBp, while SEITX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SEITX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCP.L achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than SEITX's 4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, GCP.L has underperformed SEITX with an annualized return of 2.47%, while SEITX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.
GCP.L
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 10.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
SEITX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCP.L vs. SEITX — Risk / Return Rank
GCP.L
SEITX
GCP.L vs. SEITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) and SEI Institutional International Trust International Equity Fund (SEITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCP.L | SEITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.71 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 2.29 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 1.76 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 7.17 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCP.L | SEITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.71 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.78 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.68 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.32 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCP.L and SEITX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GCP.L vs. SEITX - Dividend Comparison
GCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, less than SEITX's 16.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCP.L GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited | 9.59% | 9.41% | 9.89% | 9.72% | 6.86% | 6.46% | 6.97% | 5.77% | 5.97% | 5.89% | 6.18% | 6.33% |
SEITX SEI Institutional International Trust International Equity Fund | 16.31% | 16.80% | 12.15% | 2.04% | 1.82% | 14.32% | 0.98% | 1.73% | 1.60% | 1.30% | 1.17% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
GCP.L vs. SEITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum SEITX drawdown of -51.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCP.L and SEITX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCP.L | SEITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -66.98% | +22.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -11.23% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.22% | -30.60% | -13.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -38.19% | -6.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.88% | -7.49% | -6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -17.90% | +9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 3.26% | +1.45% |
Volatility
GCP.L vs. SEITX - Volatility Comparison
GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) and SEI Institutional International Trust International Equity Fund (SEITX) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCP.L | SEITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 5.61% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 9.45% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 16.01% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 13.37% | +6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 15.06% | +5.48% |