PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GCP.L vs. NESF.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GCP.LNESF.L
YTD Return9.12%-13.65%
1Y Return12.72%-6.59%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.32%-2.05%
5Y Return (Ann)-4.29%-2.42%
10Y Return (Ann)1.87%1.63%
Sharpe Ratio0.53-0.50
Sortino Ratio0.88-0.62
Omega Ratio1.110.93
Calmar Ratio0.28-0.26
Martin Ratio2.24-0.72
Ulcer Index4.62%12.34%
Daily Std Dev20.55%17.77%
Max Drawdown-44.22%-34.88%
Current Drawdown-24.98%-28.09%

Fundamentals


GCP.LNESF.L
Market Cap£618.75M£444.28M
EPS-£1.74£0.01
Total Revenue (TTM)£19.92M£12.00M
Gross Profit (TTM)£15.73M£12.00M
EBITDA (TTM)-£4.35M-£4.99M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between GCP.L and NESF.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GCP.L vs. NESF.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GCP.L achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than NESF.L's -13.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GCP.L has outperformed NESF.L with an annualized return of 1.87%, while NESF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.63% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.95%
-0.31%
GCP.L
NESF.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GCP.L vs. NESF.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) and NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd (NESF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCP.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.06
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GCP.L, currently valued at 3.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.06
NESF.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.39
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NESF.L, currently valued at -0.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.55

GCP.L vs. NESF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the NESF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCP.L and NESF.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
-0.35
GCP.L
NESF.L

Dividends

GCP.L vs. NESF.L - Dividend Comparison

GCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, less than NESF.L's 14.24% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GCP.L
GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited
9.78%9.72%6.86%6.46%6.97%5.77%4.50%5.89%6.18%6.33%6.22%6.74%
NESF.L
NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd
14.24%8.58%6.60%6.99%6.53%5.45%5.69%146.26%582.83%550.24%253.01%0.00%

Drawdowns

GCP.L vs. NESF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than NESF.L's maximum drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCP.L and NESF.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-24.99%
-22.03%
GCP.L
NESF.L

Volatility

GCP.L vs. NESF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited (GCP.L) is 5.19%, while NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd (NESF.L) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that GCP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.19%
6.34%
GCP.L
NESF.L

Financials

GCP.L vs. NESF.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GCP Infrastructure Investments Limited and NextEnergy Solar Fund Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items