INPFX vs. FTHRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INPFX (American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1) and FTHRX (Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - INPFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while FTHRX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, INPFX returned 7.27%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for FTHRX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INPFX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTHRX.

Performance

INPFX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INPFX achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, INPFX has outperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 7.27%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.

INPFX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 5.06%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 13.90%
• 3Y*: 11.97%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 7.27%

FTHRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 6M: 0.22%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 4.54%
• 5Y*: 1.10%
• 10Y*: 2.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INPFX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1	5.06%	14.29%	9.20%	9.46%	-8.74%	12.90%	5.67%	15.76%	-3.57%	11.43%
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund	0.15%	6.89%	3.25%	5.55%	-9.17%	-1.60%	7.06%	7.20%	0.52%	2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between INPFX and FTHRX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012	0.10

Over the past year, INPFX and FTHRX have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

INPFX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INPFX

INPFX Risk / Return Rank: 63
INPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
INPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
INPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
INPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
INPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FTHRX

FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 26
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INPFX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INPFX	FTHRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.44	+0.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	2.26	+1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.27	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	1.92	+0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.64	5.74	+5.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INPFX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INPFX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INPFX	FTHRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.44	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	0.27	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	0.60	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.91	+0.02

Drawdowns

INPFX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INPFX drawdown since its inception was -21.31%, which is greater than FTHRX's maximum drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPFX and FTHRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INPFX	FTHRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.31%	-19.01%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.20%	-2.11%	-3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.02%	-2.68%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.37%	-13.18%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.31%	-13.25%	-8.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.09%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-3.07%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	0.70%	+0.52%

Volatility

INPFX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) has a higher volatility of 1.84% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.91%. This indicates that INPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INPFX	FTHRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.84%	0.91%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.74%	2.02%	+2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.93%	2.81%	+3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.53%	4.03%	+3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.36%	3.40%	+4.96%

INPFX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INPFX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

INPFX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

INPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than FTHRX's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund	3.69%	3.59%	3.49%	2.94%	1.55%	1.53%	4.16%	2.49%	2.48%	2.20%	2.63%	2.13%
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1	5.27%	5.61%	5.15%	4.76%	4.84%	4.38%	5.54%	4.53%	4.79%	3.25%	3.53%	3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INPFX and FTHRX in my portfolio?

INPFX and FTHRX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INPFX or FTHRX?

INPFX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to FTHRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INPFX dropped -21.31% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.