INPFX vs. FSIRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

INPFX (American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1) and FSIRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, INPFX returned 7.35%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for FSIRX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INPFX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSIRX.

Performance

INPFX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INPFX achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, INPFX has outperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 7.35%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.

INPFX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 4.70%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 12.54%
• 3Y*: 11.75%
• 5Y*: 6.50%
• 10Y*: 7.35%

FSIRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 6.58%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 12.68%
• 3Y*: 9.29%
• 5Y*: 5.94%
• 10Y*: 5.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INPFX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1	4.70%	14.29%	9.20%	9.46%	-8.74%	12.90%	5.67%	15.76%	-3.57%	11.43%
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	6.58%	10.38%	5.83%	4.58%	-3.34%	15.89%	3.72%	10.55%	-3.99%	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between INPFX and FSIRX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	0.63

The correlation between INPFX and FSIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

INPFX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INPFX

INPFX Risk / Return Rank: 58
INPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
INPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
INPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
INPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
INPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FSIRX

FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INPFX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INPFX	FSIRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.54	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.50	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.48	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	4.62	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.57	18.52	-7.95

INPFX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INPFX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INPFX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INPFX drawdown since its inception was -21.31%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPFX and FSIRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INPFX	FSIRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.31%	-33.39%	+12.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.20%	-2.70%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.02%	-5.81%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.37%	-12.82%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.31%	-19.98%	-1.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-2.70%	+2.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-4.16%	+1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	0.68%	+0.55%

Volatility

INPFX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.36%. This indicates that INPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INPFX	FSIRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.97%	1.36%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.92%	3.86%	+1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.15%	4.92%	+1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.55%	6.92%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.37%	6.75%	+1.62%

INPFX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INPFX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

INPFX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

INPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than FSIRX's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I	4.27%	4.72%	4.80%	5.28%	7.33%	5.37%	2.23%	3.09%	9.42%	2.63%	2.37%	1.75%
INPFX American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1	5.29%	5.61%	5.15%	4.76%	4.84%	4.38%	5.54%	4.53%	4.79%	3.25%	3.53%	3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INPFX and FSIRX in my portfolio?

INPFX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INPFX or FSIRX?

INPFX has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to FSIRX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INPFX dropped -21.31% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.