PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INPFX vs. ABALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INPFX vs. ABALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INPFX achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than ABALX's 9.98% return. Over the past 10 years, INPFX has underperformed ABALX with an annualized return of 7.27%, while ABALX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.


INPFX

1D
0.34%
1M
1.86%
YTD
5.06%
6M
5.53%
1Y
13.90%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
7.27%

ABALX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.97%
YTD
9.98%
6M
10.60%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INPFX vs. ABALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INPFX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.06%14.29%9.20%9.46%-8.74%12.90%5.67%15.76%-3.57%11.43%
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
9.98%18.45%14.63%13.65%-12.13%15.75%10.85%18.60%-3.35%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between INPFX and ABALX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.93

The correlation between INPFX and ABALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INPFX vs. ABALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INPFX
INPFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
INPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
INPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
INPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ABALX
ABALX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ABALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ABALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABALX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INPFX vs. ABALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INPFXABALXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

2.94

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.45

4.11

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.56

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.64

-0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.64

16.45

-4.81

INPFX vs. ABALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the ABALX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INPFX and ABALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INPFXABALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.94

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.93

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.95

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.81

+0.12

Drawdowns

INPFX vs. ABALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INPFX drawdown since its inception was -21.31%, smaller than the maximum ABALX drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INPFX and ABALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INPFXABALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.31%

-40.20%

+18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-7.03%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.02%

-10.68%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.37%

-18.76%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.31%

-22.34%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-3.85%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.55%

-0.33%

Volatility

INPFX vs. ABALX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) is 1.84%, while American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that INPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INPFXABALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

2.65%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

6.86%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93%

8.71%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

10.49%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.36%

10.67%

-2.31%

INPFX vs. ABALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INPFX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ABALX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

INPFX vs. ABALX - Dividend Comparison

INPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than ABALX's 7.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABALX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A
7.54%8.27%6.87%2.05%2.30%4.30%4.35%3.49%5.49%4.72%4.24%5.60%
INPFX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.27%5.61%5.15%4.76%4.84%4.38%5.54%4.53%4.79%3.25%3.53%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, INPFX and ABALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ABALX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to INPFX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INPFX dropped -21.31% vs ABALX's -40.20%.

ABALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INPFX and ABALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer