INOV vs. PBJA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA).

INOV and PBJA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INOV is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Oct 31, 2023. PBJA is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 29, 2023.

Performance

INOV vs. PBJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INOV vs. PBJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INOV Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November	0.44%	20.64%	6.53%
PBJA PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January	-1.47%	10.33%	12.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INOV achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than PBJA's -1.47% return.

INOV

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: -4.90%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 4.07%
• 1Y: 15.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBJA

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: -1.47%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 10.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INOV vs. PBJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PBJA's 0.50% expense ratio.

INOV

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November

PBJA

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January

Return for Risk

INOV vs. PBJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INOV

INOV Risk / Return Rank: 79
INOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
INOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
INOV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
INOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
INOV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PBJA

PBJA Risk / Return Rank: 73
PBJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PBJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PBJA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PBJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
PBJA Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INOV vs. PBJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INOV	PBJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.21	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.82	+0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.31	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	1.69	+0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.13	9.52	-1.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INOV vs. PBJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the PBJA Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOV and PBJA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INOV	PBJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.21	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	1.43	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between INOV and PBJA is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

INOV vs. PBJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither INOV nor PBJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

INOV vs. PBJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOV drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, smaller than the maximum PBJA drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOV and PBJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	INOV	PBJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-8.50%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	-6.16%	-1.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.06%	-2.29%	-2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.85%	-0.58%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	1.09%	+0.69%

Volatility

INOV vs. PBJA - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) at 2.50%. This indicates that INOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INOV	PBJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	2.50%	+2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.67%	3.73%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.85%	8.31%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.33%	6.53%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.33%	6.53%	+1.80%