INOV vs. BALT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INOV (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November) and BALT (Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INOV is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while BALT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. INOV is actively managed, while BALT is passively managed. Over the past year, INOV returned 14.54% vs 6.95% for BALT. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BALT.

Performance

INOV vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INOV achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly higher than BALT's 1.91% return.

INOV

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 14.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BALT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.81%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INOV vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
INOV Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November	5.40%	20.64%	5.90%	7.73%
BALT Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF	1.91%	6.65%	9.98%	2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between INOV and BALT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023	0.55

The correlation between INOV and BALT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

INOV vs. BALT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INOV	BALT
Financial Services	24.7%	11.9%
Industrials	19.8%	8.1%
Healthcare	10.6%	8.4%
Technology	10.3%	36.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	4.9%
Basic Materials	5.9%	1.8%
Communication Services	4.5%	10.9%
Energy	4.0%	3.5%
Utilities	4.0%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

INOV vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INOV

INOV Risk / Return Rank: 49
INOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
INOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
INOV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
INOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
INOV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

BALT

BALT Risk / Return Rank: 92
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INOV vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INOV	BALT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	3.19	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	4.88	-2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.67	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	6.05	-4.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	22.58	-14.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INOV vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INOV and BALT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INOV	BALT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	3.19	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.82	1.80	+0.03

Drawdowns

INOV vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INOV drawdown since its inception was -8.01%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INOV and BALT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INOV	BALT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-4.89%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	-1.15%	-6.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.06%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-0.34%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	0.31%	+1.49%

Volatility

INOV vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - November (INOV) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.37%. This indicates that INOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INOV	BALT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.96%	0.37%	+2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.71%	1.56%	+6.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.69%	2.19%	+6.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.56%	3.32%	+5.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.56%	3.32%	+5.24%

INOV vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

INOV vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

Neither INOV nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INOV and BALT in my portfolio?

INOV and BALT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INOV or BALT?

INOV has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to BALT (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INOV dropped -8.01% vs BALT's -4.89%.

Which ETF is better, INOV or BALT?

On 1-year performance, INOV leads with 14.54% vs 6.95% for BALT. On fees, BALT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INOV or BALT?

Over the 1-year period, INOV has performed better with a 14.54% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INOV or BALT?

BALT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INOV or BALT?

INOV and BALT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between INOV and BALT?

INOV is categorized as Options Trading, while BALT is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INOV and 0.69% for BALT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.