INMU vs. TAXI
INMU (BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF) and TAXI (Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. INMU is actively managed, while TAXI is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INMU charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXI.
Performance
INMU vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INMU achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than TAXI's 0.94% return.
INMU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
TAXI
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INMU vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF | 1.73% | 3.96% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.94% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between INMU and TAXI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INMU vs. TAXI — Risk / Return Rank
INMU
TAXI
INMU vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INMU | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INMU | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 2.92 | -2.33 |
Drawdowns
INMU vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INMU drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INMU and TAXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INMU | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -2.23% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.79% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -0.46% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | — | — |
Volatility
INMU vs. TAXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INMU | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51% | 1.90% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.60% | 1.90% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 1.90% | +1.64% |
INMU vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
INMU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
INMU vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison
INMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than TAXI's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF | 3.36% | 3.48% | 3.47% | 3.44% | 1.92% | 1.14% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.00% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INMU and TAXI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INMU.
INMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 2.00% for TAXI.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INMU and 0.05% for TAXI.
Find the right allocation for INMU and TAXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer