INMU vs. GUMI
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI).
INMU and GUMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. INMU is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 16, 2021. GUMI is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 23, 2024.
Performance
INMU vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
INMU vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF | 0.28% | 5.52% | 1.13% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 0.67% | 3.39% | 1.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INMU achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than GUMI's 0.67% return.
INMU
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- —
GUMI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
INMU vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
INMU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
INMU vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank
INMU
GUMI
INMU vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INMU | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 2.82 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 4.39 | -3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.62 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 6.88 | -5.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 29.42 | -23.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INMU | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 2.82 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 3.32 | -2.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between INMU and GUMI is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
INMU vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison
INMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than GUMI's 2.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF | 3.39% | 3.48% | 3.47% | 3.44% | 1.92% | 1.14% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.81% | 2.95% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
INMU vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INMU drawdown since its inception was -10.67%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INMU and GUMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| INMU | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -0.48% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | -0.48% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -0.04% | -2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -0.05% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.11% | +0.79% |
Volatility
INMU vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) at 0.18%. This indicates that INMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| INMU | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 0.18% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 0.75% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 1.15% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.59% | 1.01% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 1.01% | +2.57% |