INMU vs. BLCV
INMU (BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF) and BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BLCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INMU charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BLCV.
Performance
INMU vs. BLCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INMU
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.83%
BLCV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.47M | $4.77M | $4.63M |
INMU vs. BLCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF | 0.65% | 5.52% | 2.77% | 4.60% |
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF | 6.47% | 19.96% | 12.63% | 14.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between INMU and BLCV is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INMU vs. BLCV — Risk / Return Rank
INMU
BLCV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INMU vs. BLCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) and Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INMU | BLCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INMU vs. BLCV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INMU | BLCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
INMU vs. BLCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INMU | BLCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.62% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.51% | — | — |
INMU vs. BLCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
INMU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BLCV's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
INMU vs. BLCV - Dividend Comparison
INMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, while BLCV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF | 1.01% | 1.37% | 1.63% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INMU BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF | 3.41% | 3.48% | 3.47% | 3.44% | 1.92% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INMU and BLCV have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INMU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INMU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.
INMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 1.01% for BLCV.
INMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BLCV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for INMU and 0.55% for BLCV.
Find the right allocation for INMU and BLCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer