PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INKM vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INKM vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.25% return. Over the past 10 years, INKM has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 5.59%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.76% annualized return.


INKM

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.93%
YTD
5.61%
6M
5.74%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.59%

VXUS

1D
-0.99%
1M
4.68%
YTD
14.25%
6M
16.92%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
9.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INKM vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
5.61%11.86%5.70%10.26%-12.58%8.52%3.11%17.12%-5.32%13.95%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.25%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between INKM and VXUS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012

0.77

The correlation between INKM and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

INKM vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INKM
VXUS

Industrials

14.6%
16.1%

Utilities

13.9%
3.2%

Technology

13.2%
18.1%

Energy

11.1%
5.2%

Real Estate

10.9%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
5.0%

Financial Services

8.3%
22.3%

Healthcare

6.8%
7.1%

Communication Services

6.2%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
8.4%

Basic Materials

1.4%
7.6%

Industrials

INKM
14.6%
VXUS
16.1%

Utilities

INKM
13.9%
VXUS
3.2%

Technology

INKM
13.2%
VXUS
18.1%

Energy

INKM
11.1%
VXUS
5.2%

Real Estate

INKM
10.9%
VXUS
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

INKM
8.6%
VXUS
5.0%

Financial Services

INKM
8.3%
VXUS
22.3%

Healthcare

INKM
6.8%
VXUS
7.1%

Communication Services

INKM
6.2%
VXUS
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

INKM
5.1%
VXUS
8.4%

Basic Materials

INKM
1.4%
VXUS
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INKM vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INKM vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INKMVXUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.12

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

2.90

+0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.39

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.85

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.30

11.14

+0.16

INKM vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INKM Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INKM and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INKMVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.12

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.57

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.39

+0.19

Drawdowns

INKM vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INKMVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-35.97%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

-11.27%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

-13.58%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

-29.44%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

-35.97%

+7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.99%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-8.22%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

2.88%

-1.73%

Volatility

INKM vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) is 1.67%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that INKM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INKMVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

5.60%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

13.00%

-8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95%

15.21%

-9.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.30%

16.05%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.78%

17.16%

-7.38%

INKM vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

INKM vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
4.86%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.66%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


INKM and VXUS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INKM dropped -28.58% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 9.76% vs 5.59% for INKM. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 9.76% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for INKM.

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for INKM and 0.05% for VXUS.

INKM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INKM and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer