PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
INKM vs. FIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

INKM vs. FIXT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. INKM is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INKM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.

Performance

INKM vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INKM achieves a 5.61% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 0.23% return.

INKM

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.93%
YTD
5.61%
6M
5.74%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.59%

FIXT

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.07%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INKM vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF		5.61%6.52%
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF		0.23%4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between INKM and FIXT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

0.58

INKM vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
INKM
FIXT

Industrials

14.6%

-

Utilities

13.9%

-

Technology

13.2%

-

Energy

11.1%

-

Real Estate

10.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.6%

-

Financial Services

8.3%

-

Healthcare

6.8%
100.0%

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Industrials

INKM
14.6%
FIXT

-

Utilities

INKM
13.9%
FIXT

-

Technology

INKM
13.2%
FIXT

-

Energy

INKM
11.1%
FIXT

-

Real Estate

INKM
10.9%
FIXT

-

Consumer Defensive

INKM
8.6%
FIXT

-

Financial Services

INKM
8.3%
FIXT

-

Healthcare

INKM
6.8%
FIXT
100.0%

Communication Services

INKM
6.2%
FIXT

-

Consumer Cyclical

INKM
5.1%
FIXT

-

Basic Materials

INKM
1.4%
FIXT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF

Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF

Often compared with INKM:
INKM vs. INCMINKM vs. GALINKM vs. AOAINKM vs. CEFSINKM vs. VOOINKM vs. SPHYINKM vs. DIVO
Often compared with FIXT:
FIXT vs. AIRRFIXT vs. WBIFFIXT vs. KLMTFIXT vs. VTFIXT vs. WBIGFIXT vs. AVGVFIXT vs. FLXR

Return for Risk

INKM vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
FIXT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INKM vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

INKMFIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.20

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.12

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.30

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INKM vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

INKMFIXTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.34

-0.76

Drawdowns

INKM vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INKM drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INKM and FIXT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

INKMFIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-3.02%

-25.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.55%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-1.88%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-0.71%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

—

—

Volatility

INKM vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

INKMFIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.95%

3.77%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.30%

3.77%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.78%

3.77%

+6.01%

INKM vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INKM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

INKM vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

INKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than FIXT's 5.55% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF		5.55%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF		4.86%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

INKM and FIXT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 4.86% for INKM.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for INKM and 0.75% for FIXT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INKM and FIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer