INFR vs. ILIT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and ILIT (Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - INFR tracks the RARE Global Infrastructure Index while ILIT tracks the STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, INFR returned 6.42% vs 198.34% for ILIT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ILIT.

Performance

INFR vs. ILIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFR achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than ILIT's 30.75% return.

INFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 6.42%
• 3Y*: 5.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILIT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -10.68%
• YTD: 30.75%
• 6M: 38.84%
• 1Y: 198.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFR vs. ILIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-6.23%	-0.06%
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF	30.75%	81.51%	-45.14%	-28.86%

Correlation

The correlation between INFR and ILIT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023	0.24

The correlation between INFR and ILIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INFR vs. ILIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INFR	ILIT
Utilities	68.5%	-
Industrials	27.5%	6.4%
Real Estate	4.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	81.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	4.9%

Return for Risk

INFR vs. ILIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFR

INFR Risk / Return Rank: 29
INFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
INFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
INFR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
INFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
INFR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

ILIT

ILIT Risk / Return Rank: 91
ILIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ILIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ILIT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ILIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ILIT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFR vs. ILIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) and Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INFR	ILIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	4.09	-3.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	4.06	-2.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.50	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	8.42	-6.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.26	23.63	-17.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INFR vs. ILIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the ILIT Sharpe Ratio of 4.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFR and ILIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INFR	ILIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	4.09	-3.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	-0.06	+0.52

Drawdowns

INFR vs. ILIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFR drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum ILIT drawdown of -73.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFR and ILIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	INFR	ILIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-73.69%	+54.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.43%	-22.86%	+16.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-14.46%	+13.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-45.91%	+40.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	8.15%	-6.11%

Volatility

INFR vs. ILIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is 0.00%, while Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that INFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INFR	ILIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	11.61%	-11.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.86%	33.12%	-29.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.04%	48.84%	-39.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.27%	41.55%	-27.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.27%	41.55%	-27.28%

INFR vs. ILIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ILIT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

INFR vs. ILIT - Dividend Comparison

INFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than ILIT's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF	1.74%	2.27%	6.48%	0.69%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	2.49%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INFR and ILIT in my portfolio?

INFR and ILIT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INFR or ILIT?

ILIT has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to INFR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFR dropped -19.28% vs ILIT's -73.69%.

Which ETF is better, INFR or ILIT?

On 1-year performance, ILIT leads with 198.34% vs 6.42% for INFR. On fees, ILIT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, INFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INFR or ILIT?

Over the 1-year period, ILIT has performed better with a 198.34% return vs 6.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INFR or ILIT?

ILIT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INFR or ILIT?

INFR has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.74% for ILIT.

What is the main difference between INFR and ILIT?

INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index, while ILIT tracks STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: ClearBridge and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for INFR and 0.47% for ILIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.09 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.