PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFL vs. VEGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INFL vs. VEGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than VEGA's 7.10% return.


INFL

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
17.21%
6M
17.82%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
21.83%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*

VEGA

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.04%
YTD
7.10%
6M
6.87%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFL vs. VEGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
17.21%18.30%23.34%1.62%2.65%24.77%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
7.10%15.83%11.20%15.12%-15.02%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between INFL and VEGA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021

0.62

The correlation between INFL and VEGA shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INFL vs. VEGA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INFL
VEGA

Energy

40.5%
3.5%

Financial Services

21.1%
14.6%

Basic Materials

20.0%
2.6%

Utilities

2.9%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.6%

Industrials

1.8%
10.8%

Healthcare

1.2%
8.4%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.8%

Communication Services

0.3%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Technology

-

31.7%

Energy

INFL
40.5%
VEGA
3.5%

Financial Services

INFL
21.1%
VEGA
14.6%

Basic Materials

INFL
20.0%
VEGA
2.6%

Utilities

INFL
2.9%
VEGA
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

INFL
2.4%
VEGA
4.6%

Industrials

INFL
1.8%
VEGA
10.8%

Healthcare

INFL
1.2%
VEGA
8.4%

Real Estate

INFL
1.1%
VEGA
1.8%

Communication Services

INFL
0.3%
VEGA
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

INFL

-

VEGA
10.1%

Technology

INFL

-

VEGA
31.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INFL vs. VEGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFL
INFL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INFL vs. VEGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INFLVEGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.76

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.68

12.41

-4.73

INFL vs. VEGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the VEGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFL and VEGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INFLVEGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.09

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.59

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.53

+0.39

Drawdowns

INFL vs. VEGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum VEGA drawdown of -28.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and VEGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INFLVEGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-28.37%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-6.86%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-11.62%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-22.78%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-0.52%

-4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-3.79%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.52%

+1.54%

Volatility

INFL vs. VEGA - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) at 2.71%. This indicates that INFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INFLVEGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.71%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

7.45%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

9.06%

+6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

12.29%

+5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

12.70%

+4.94%

INFL vs. VEGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGA's 2.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

INFL vs. VEGA - Dividend Comparison

INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VEGA's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
0.91%1.26%1.77%1.60%1.65%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.25%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


INFL and VEGA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INFL has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to VEGA (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFL dropped -21.30% vs VEGA's -28.37%.

On 5-year performance, INFL leads with 13.12% vs 7.25% for VEGA. On fees, INFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INFL has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

VEGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.91% for INFL.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon Kinetics LLC and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INFL and 2.02% for VEGA.

VEGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INFL and VEGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer