INFL vs. FTSD
INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) and FTSD (Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizon Kinetics LLC, while FTSD is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, INFL returned 13.12%/yr vs 2.46%/yr for FTSD. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INFL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FTSD.
Performance
INFL vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than FTSD's 0.80% return.
INFL
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
FTSD
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.05%
INFL vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 17.21% | 18.30% | 23.34% | 1.62% | 2.65% | 24.77% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 0.80% | 5.66% | 5.20% | 4.84% | -3.13% | -0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFL and FTSD is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between INFL and FTSD shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFL vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank
INFL
FTSD
INFL vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INFL | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.69 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 9.59 | -6.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.68 | 38.36 | -30.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INFL | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 3.30 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 1.33 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
INFL vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and FTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFL | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -5.32% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -0.45% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -0.93% | -14.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -5.04% | -16.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -0.12% | -5.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -0.60% | -4.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 0.11% | +2.95% |
Volatility
INFL vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.51%. This indicates that INFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFL | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 0.51% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 1.03% | +11.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 1.31% | +14.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 1.85% | +15.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 1.79% | +15.85% |
INFL vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFL vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison
INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than FTSD's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.50% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 0.91% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFL and FTSD have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INFL has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to FTSD (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFL dropped -21.30% vs FTSD's -5.32%.
On 5-year performance, INFL leads with 13.12% vs 2.46% for FTSD. On fees, FTSD is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FTSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, INFL has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 2.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTSD is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.
FTSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 0.91% for INFL.
INFL is categorized as Global Equities, while FTSD is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: Horizon Kinetics LLC and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INFL and 0.25% for FTSD.
FTSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INFL and FTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer