INFH vs. SPYT
INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) and SPYT (Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFH is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while SPYT is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Defiance. Both are actively managed. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. INFH charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SPYT.
Performance
INFH vs. SPYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INFH
- 1D
- 17.48%
- 1M
- -52.72%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPYT
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.99M | $2.39M | $2.98M | |
| $1.51M | $2.10M | $2.42M |
INFH vs. SPYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | -70.81% |
SPYT Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF | -1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFH and SPYT is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFH vs. SPYT — Risk / Return Rank
INFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYT
INFH vs. SPYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFH | SPYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFH vs. SPYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -75.15%, which is greater than SPYT's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and SPYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFH | SPYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.15% | -18.25% | -56.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.81% | -1.92% | -68.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.80% | -1.98% | -45.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
INFH vs. SPYT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFH | SPYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 202.20% | 11.59% | +190.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 202.20% | 14.71% | +187.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 202.20% | 14.71% | +187.49% |
INFH vs. SPYT - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYT's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFH vs. SPYT - Dividend Comparison
INFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYT Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF | 21.24% | 21.40% | 17.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFH and SPYT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYT is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYT is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.
SPYT has the higher dividend yield at 21.24%, compared with 0.00% for INFH.
INFH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPYT is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.87% for SPYT.
Find the right allocation for INFH and SPYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer