PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFH vs. PLUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INFH vs. PLUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


INFH

1D
17.48%
1M
-52.72%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PLUL

1D
-2.86%
1M
-36.23%
6M
-48.08%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.99M$2.39M$2.98M
$187.20K$434.71K$1.40M

INFH vs. PLUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INFH and PLUL is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INFH vs. PLUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INFH vs. PLUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INFH vs. PLUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -75.15%, roughly equal to the maximum PLUL drawdown of -77.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and PLUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INFHPLULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.15%

-77.67%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.81%

-77.67%

+6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.80%

-34.33%

-13.47%

Volatility

INFH vs. PLUL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INFHPLULDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

202.20%

175.52%

+26.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

202.20%

175.52%

+26.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

202.20%

175.52%

+26.68%

INFH vs. PLUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PLUL's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

INFH vs. PLUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither INFH nor PLUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


INFH and PLUL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLUL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLUL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.

INFH and PLUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.75% for PLUL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INFH and PLUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer