PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INFH vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INFH vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


INFH

1D
-10.66%
1M
-44.84%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
-0.98%
1M
3.54%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INFH vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between INFH and NTSD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INFH vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

INFH vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INFH vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -55.31%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INFHNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.31%

-5.58%

-49.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.31%

-0.98%

-54.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.60%

-1.15%

-33.45%

Volatility

INFH vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INFHNTSDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

210.08%

23.91%

+186.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

210.08%

23.91%

+186.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

210.08%

23.91%

+186.17%

INFH vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

INFH vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

INFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INFH and NTSD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.

NTSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for INFH.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INFH and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer