INFH vs. CRMG
INFH (Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. INFH charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
INFH vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
INFH
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -58.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 18.32%
- 6M
- -51.86%
- YTD
- -65.13%
- 1Y
- -67.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFH vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
INFH Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF | -73.89% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -20.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFH and CRMG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFH vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
INFH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
INFH vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tidal Trust II - Defiance Daily Target 2X Long INFQ ETF (INFH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INFH | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INFH vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFH drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFH and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFH | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.38% | -79.83% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.89% | -74.49% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.97% | -41.14% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 45.60% | — |
Volatility
INFH vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFH | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 195.98% | 77.99% | +117.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 195.98% | 75.67% | +120.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 195.98% | 75.67% | +120.31% |
INFH vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFH has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFH vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither INFH nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
INFH and CRMG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for INFH.
INFH and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for INFH and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for INFH and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer