INDZX vs. SLMCX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

INDZX (Columbia Large Cap Value Fund) and SLMCX (Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund) are both mutual funds - INDZX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia, while SLMCX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, INDZX returned 13.02%/yr vs 28.22%/yr for SLMCX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDZX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for SLMCX.

Performance

INDZX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Value Fund (INDZX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDZX achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly lower than SLMCX's 55.72% return. Over the past 10 years, INDZX has underperformed SLMCX with an annualized return of 13.02%, while SLMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.22% annualized return.

INDZX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 1.04%
• 6M: 15.24%
• YTD: 15.24%
• 1Y: 28.16%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: 11.71%
• 10Y*: 13.02%

SLMCX

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -1.85%
• 6M: 55.72%
• YTD: 55.72%
• 1Y: 104.25%
• 3Y*: 44.19%
• 5Y*: 24.96%
• 10Y*: 28.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDZX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INDZX Columbia Large Cap Value Fund	15.24%	19.67%	15.42%	9.64%	-5.26%	23.70%	13.01%	29.81%	-11.20%	16.20%
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund	55.72%	37.32%	26.67%	44.27%	-31.14%	38.97%	44.45%	54.15%	-8.12%	34.08%

Correlation

The correlation between INDZX and SLMCX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 1990	0.67

The correlation between INDZX and SLMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

INDZX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDZX

INDZX Risk / Return Rank: 90
INDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
INDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
INDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
INDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
INDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SLMCX

SLMCX Risk / Return Rank: 96
SLMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SLMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SLMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SLMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SLMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDZX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Value Fund (INDZX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INDZX	SLMCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	3.87	-1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	4.17	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.56	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.05	8.81	-4.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.53	31.79	-15.27

INDZX vs. SLMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is lower than the SLMCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDZX and SLMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INDZX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDZX drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum SLMCX drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDZX and SLMCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDZX	SLMCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.02%	-68.10%	+9.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.14%	-12.33%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.73%	-29.13%	+13.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.21%	-37.32%	+19.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.51%	-37.32%	-1.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-2.20%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-12.98%	+5.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	3.40%	-1.66%

Volatility

INDZX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Large Cap Value Fund (INDZX) is 4.07%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that INDZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDZX	SLMCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	12.11%	-8.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.79%	21.92%	-13.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	28.12%	-16.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.73%	26.65%	-11.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.71%	26.25%	-8.54%

INDZX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDZX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SLMCX's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDZX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison

INDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than SLMCX's 6.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INDZX Columbia Large Cap Value Fund	6.29%	7.40%	9.31%	5.79%	9.05%	6.47%	8.08%	5.65%	12.21%	6.39%	2.66%	13.70%
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund	6.07%	9.45%	14.27%	5.16%	9.42%	11.75%	10.40%	11.44%	12.33%	11.15%	8.19%	10.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDZX and SLMCX in my portfolio?

INDZX and SLMCX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDZX or SLMCX?

SLMCX has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to INDZX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDZX dropped -59.02% vs SLMCX's -68.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.