INDY vs. IMCG
INDY (iShares India 50 ETF) and IMCG (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDY is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Nifty 50 Index, while IMCG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDY returned 6.65%/yr vs 14.48%/yr for IMCG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMCG.
Performance
INDY vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDY achieves a -13.37% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's 18.63% return. Over the past 10 years, INDY has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 6.65%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.
INDY
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- -13.37%
- 6M
- -11.62%
- 1Y
- -12.55%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
IMCG
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 18.63%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 14.48%
INDY vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | -13.37% | 4.97% | 3.47% | 16.88% | -7.31% | 19.43% | 10.01% | 9.99% | -4.32% | 36.15% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 18.63% | 6.55% | 18.14% | 20.73% | -25.79% | 15.39% | 45.64% | 35.70% | -3.68% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDY and IMCG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2009 | 0.51 |
The correlation between INDY and IMCG shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDY vs. IMCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDY
IMCG
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDY
IMCG
Consumer Cyclical
INDY
IMCG
Energy
INDY
IMCG
Technology
INDY
IMCG
Industrials
INDY
IMCG
Basic Materials
INDY
IMCG
Consumer Defensive
INDY
IMCG
Communication Services
INDY
IMCG
Healthcare
INDY
IMCG
Utilities
INDY
IMCG
Real Estate
INDY
-
IMCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDY vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank
INDY
IMCG
INDY vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDY | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.24 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 2.16 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | 8.22 | -9.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDY vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDY drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDY and IMCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDY | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -58.96% | +14.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.95% | -10.17% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | -21.92% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.40% | -35.08% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.50% | -35.08% | -8.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.12% | -1.66% | -17.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -9.21% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 2.66% | +6.06% |
Volatility
INDY vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) is 3.98%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that INDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDY | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 7.07% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 13.73% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 16.49% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 20.31% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 20.58% | -1.00% |
INDY vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDY vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
INDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than IMCG's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.66% | 0.78% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | 9.36% | 8.11% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 3.75% | 7.12% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.27% | 0.48% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDY and IMCG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMCG has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to INDY (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDY dropped -44.74% vs IMCG's -58.96%.
On 10-year performance, IMCG leads with 14.48% vs 6.65% for INDY. On fees, IMCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, INDY has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IMCG has performed better with a 14.48% return vs 6.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INDY.
INDY has the higher dividend yield at 9.36%, compared with 0.66% for IMCG.
INDY is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IMCG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. INDY tracks Nifty 50 Index, while IMCG tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for INDY and 0.06% for IMCG.
IMCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDY and IMCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer