INDS vs. FDLS
INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) and FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while FDLS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, INDS returned 2.57%/yr vs 19.65%/yr for FDLS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FDLS.
Performance
INDS vs. FDLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDS achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than FDLS's 13.12% return.
INDS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- —
FDLS
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INDS vs. FDLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 6.59% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -14.26% |
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 13.12% | 22.47% | 7.41% | 20.70% | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDS and FDLS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between INDS and FDLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
INDS vs. FDLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDS
FDLS
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
INDS
FDLS
Basic Materials
INDS
-
FDLS
Communication Services
INDS
-
FDLS
Consumer Cyclical
INDS
-
FDLS
Consumer Defensive
INDS
-
FDLS
Energy
INDS
-
FDLS
Financial Services
INDS
-
FDLS
Healthcare
INDS
-
FDLS
Industrials
INDS
-
FDLS
Technology
INDS
-
FDLS
Utilities
INDS
-
FDLS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDS vs. FDLS — Risk / Return Rank
INDS
FDLS
INDS vs. FDLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDS | FDLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.35 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 3.48 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | 13.96 | -11.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDS | FDLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.99 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.86 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
INDS vs. FDLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, which is greater than FDLS's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and FDLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDS | FDLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.17% | -23.32% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -9.55% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.96% | -23.32% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.51% | -2.66% | -17.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -3.88% | -11.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.37% | +1.67% |
Volatility
INDS vs. FDLS - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) at 4.36%. This indicates that INDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDS | FDLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 4.36% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.10% | 12.45% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 16.71% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 19.07% | +1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.11% | 19.07% | +4.04% |
INDS vs. FDLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLS's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDS vs. FDLS - Dividend Comparison
INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than FDLS's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.86% | 7.26% | 0.97% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.55% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDS and FDLS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to FDLS (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs FDLS's -23.32%.
On 3-year performance, FDLS leads with 19.65% vs 2.57% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FDLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDLS has performed better with a 19.65% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.
INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.87% for FDLS.
INDS is categorized as REIT, while FDLS is Mid Cap Blend Equities. INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.76% for FDLS.
FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDS and FDLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer