PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDS vs. FDLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDS vs. FDLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDS achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than FDLS's 13.12% return.


INDS

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
6.59%
6M
5.24%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*

FDLS

1D
-1.15%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
13.12%
6M
13.26%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDS vs. FDLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
6.59%7.78%-12.69%17.72%-14.26%
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
13.12%22.47%7.41%20.70%-1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between INDS and FDLS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022

0.55

The correlation between INDS and FDLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

INDS vs. FDLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDS
FDLS

Real Estate

100.0%
2.1%

Basic Materials

-

5.0%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

7.1%

Financial Services

-

14.3%

Healthcare

-

11.7%

Industrials

-

18.8%

Technology

-

25.7%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Real Estate

INDS
100.0%
FDLS
2.1%

Basic Materials

INDS

-

FDLS
5.0%

Communication Services

INDS

-

FDLS
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

INDS

-

FDLS
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

INDS

-

FDLS
4.9%

Energy

INDS

-

FDLS
7.1%

Financial Services

INDS

-

FDLS
14.3%

Healthcare

INDS

-

FDLS
11.7%

Industrials

INDS

-

FDLS
18.8%

Technology

INDS

-

FDLS
25.7%

Utilities

INDS

-

FDLS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDS vs. FDLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDS
INDS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLS
FDLS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDS vs. FDLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INDSFDLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

3.48

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

13.96

-11.53

INDS vs. FDLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the FDLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDS and FDLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INDSFDLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.99

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.86

-0.48

Drawdowns

INDS vs. FDLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, which is greater than FDLS's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and FDLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDSFDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-23.32%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-9.55%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.96%

-23.32%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.51%

-2.66%

-17.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-3.88%

-11.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

2.37%

+1.67%

Volatility

INDS vs. FDLS - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) at 4.36%. This indicates that INDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDSFDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

4.36%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

12.45%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.23%

16.71%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.16%

19.07%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

19.07%

+4.04%

INDS vs. FDLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLS's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDS vs. FDLS - Dividend Comparison

INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than FDLS's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
0.87%0.86%7.26%0.97%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
3.55%3.70%3.75%3.11%2.63%1.24%1.68%2.26%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDS and FDLS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to FDLS (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs FDLS's -23.32%.

On 3-year performance, FDLS leads with 19.65% vs 2.57% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FDLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FDLS has performed better with a 19.65% return vs 2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.87% for FDLS.

INDS is categorized as REIT, while FDLS is Mid Cap Blend Equities. INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.76% for FDLS.

FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDS and FDLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer