INDS vs. COWZ
INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INDS returned 1.10%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for COWZ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
INDS vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INDS having a 8.07% return and COWZ slightly higher at 8.30%.
INDS
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 11.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
INDS vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 8.07% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -32.68% | 54.61% | 12.62% | 42.25% | -0.54% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.30% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -11.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDS and COWZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between INDS and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
INDS vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDS
COWZ
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
INDS
COWZ
-
Basic Materials
INDS
-
COWZ
Communication Services
INDS
-
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
INDS
-
COWZ
Consumer Defensive
INDS
-
COWZ
Energy
INDS
-
COWZ
Financial Services
INDS
-
COWZ
-
Healthcare
INDS
-
COWZ
Industrials
INDS
-
COWZ
Technology
INDS
-
COWZ
Utilities
INDS
-
COWZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDS vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
INDS
COWZ
INDS vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INDS | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.37 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 4.57 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 12.47 | -9.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INDS | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 2.06 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.60 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.65 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
INDS vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDS | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.17% | -38.63% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.23% | -5.00% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.96% | -22.00% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.17% | -22.00% | -18.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.41% | -0.80% | -18.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.57% | -4.80% | -10.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 1.83% | +2.21% |
Volatility
INDS vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.50%. This indicates that INDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDS | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 2.50% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 7.12% | +5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 11.08% | +5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 17.63% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.10% | 19.92% | +3.18% |
INDS vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDS vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than COWZ's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.59% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDS and COWZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDS has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to COWZ (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.60% vs 1.10% for INDS. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for INDS.
INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 2.16% for COWZ.
INDS is categorized as REIT, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDS and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer