PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDS vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDS vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INDS having a 8.07% return and COWZ slightly higher at 8.30%.


INDS

1D
1.38%
1M
0.65%
YTD
8.07%
6M
7.01%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*

COWZ

1D
0.11%
1M
2.05%
YTD
8.30%
6M
8.95%
1Y
22.75%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDS vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
8.07%7.78%-12.69%17.72%-32.68%54.61%12.62%42.25%-0.54%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.30%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between INDS and COWZ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.52

The correlation between INDS and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

INDS vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDS
COWZ

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.9%

Energy

-

16.9%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

21.8%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Technology

-

16.0%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

INDS
100.0%
COWZ

-

Basic Materials

INDS

-

COWZ
3.7%

Communication Services

INDS

-

COWZ
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

INDS

-

COWZ
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

INDS

-

COWZ
10.9%

Energy

INDS

-

COWZ
16.9%

Financial Services

INDS

-

COWZ

-

Healthcare

INDS

-

COWZ
21.8%

Industrials

INDS

-

COWZ
8.4%

Technology

INDS

-

COWZ
16.0%

Utilities

INDS

-

COWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDS vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDS
INDS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDS vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INDSCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.37

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

4.57

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

12.47

-9.73

INDS vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDS and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INDSCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.06

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.60

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.65

-0.26

Drawdowns

INDS vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDS drawdown since its inception was -40.17%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDS and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDSCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-38.63%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-5.00%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.96%

-22.00%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.17%

-22.00%

-18.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.41%

-0.80%

-18.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.57%

-4.80%

-10.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

1.83%

+2.21%

Volatility

INDS vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.50%. This indicates that INDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDSCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

2.50%

+2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

7.12%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

11.08%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

17.63%

+2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

19.92%

+3.18%

INDS vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDS vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than COWZ's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.16%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
3.59%3.70%3.75%3.11%2.63%1.24%1.68%2.26%1.81%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDS and COWZ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDS has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to COWZ (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDS dropped -40.17% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.60% vs 1.10% for INDS. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for INDS.

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 2.16% for COWZ.

INDS is categorized as REIT, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for INDS and 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDS and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer