INDL vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

INDL (Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. INDL is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, INDL returned -28.62% vs 6388.53% for MULL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDL charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

INDL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDL achieves a -24.01% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 907.48% return.

INDL

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: -24.01%
• 6M: -23.89%
• 1Y: -28.62%
• 3Y*: 0.30%
• 5Y*: -2.38%
• 10Y*: -0.61%

MULL

• 1D: 5.57%
• 1M: 246.94%
• YTD: 907.48%
• 6M: 1,268.17%
• 1Y: 6,388.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INDL Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares	-24.01%	-3.21%	-3.84%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	907.48%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between INDL and MULL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.17

INDL vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INDL	MULL
Financial Services	28.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	-
Industrials	10.3%	-
Energy	9.4%	-
Basic Materials	8.6%	-
Technology	8.2%	66.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	-
Healthcare	6.1%	-
Communication Services	4.6%	-
Utilities	4.5%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

INDL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDL

INDL Risk / Return Rank: 2
INDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
INDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
INDL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
INDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
INDL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INDL	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	49.08	-50.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	7.09	-8.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.90	-1.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	130.56	-131.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.61	439.01	-440.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INDL vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 49.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDL and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INDL	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98	49.08	-50.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	7.34	-7.46

Drawdowns

INDL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDL drawdown since its inception was -95.67%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDL and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDL	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.67%	-72.29%	-23.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.82%	-53.09%	+15.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.61%	0.00%	-78.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.35%	-20.67%	-45.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.41%	15.79%	+1.62%

Volatility

INDL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) is 10.11%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.71%. This indicates that INDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDL	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.11%	55.71%	-45.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.31%	105.59%	-80.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.39%	132.53%	-103.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.53%	136.39%	-105.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.73%	136.39%	-83.66%

INDL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDL has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

INDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INDL Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares	1.66%	1.42%	2.79%	1.65%	0.09%	2.35%	0.00%	0.68%	0.18%	0.31%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDL and MULL in my portfolio?

INDL and MULL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDL or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.71%) compared to INDL (10.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDL dropped -95.67% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, INDL or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6388.53% vs -28.62% for INDL. On fees, INDL is cheaper at 1.33% per year. On volatility, INDL has been the lower-risk option at 10.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INDL or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6388.53% return vs -28.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDL or MULL?

INDL is cheaper with a 1.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDL or MULL?

INDL has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between INDL and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for INDL and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (49.08 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.