INDL vs. INTW
INDL (Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. INDL is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, INDL returned -24.89% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDL charges 1.33%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
INDL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDL achieves a -21.27% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.
INDL
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- -21.27%
- 6M
- -22.49%
- 1Y
- -24.89%
- 3Y*
- 0.97%
- 5Y*
- -1.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.06%
INTW
- 1D
- -12.49%
- 1M
- 12.21%
- YTD
- 750.22%
- 6M
- 775.58%
- 1Y
- 1,964.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INDL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
INDL Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares | -21.27% | 9.16% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 750.22% | 60.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDL and INTW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.22 |
INDL vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDL
INTW
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDL
INTW
-
Consumer Cyclical
INDL
INTW
-
Industrials
INDL
INTW
-
Energy
INDL
INTW
-
Basic Materials
INDL
INTW
-
Technology
INDL
INTW
Healthcare
INDL
INTW
-
Consumer Defensive
INDL
INTW
-
Communication Services
INDL
INTW
-
Utilities
INDL
INTW
-
Real Estate
INDL
INTW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
INDL
INTW
INDL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.65 | -0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 40.32 | -40.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 91.49 | -92.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDL drawdown since its inception was -95.67%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDL and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.67% | -60.58% | -35.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.82% | -49.34% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.84% | -12.49% | -65.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.38% | -29.66% | -36.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.84% | 21.70% | -2.86% |
Volatility
INDL vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) is 9.26%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that INDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDL | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 55.81% | -46.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.26% | 119.10% | -92.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.04% | 150.14% | -120.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.72% | 148.88% | -118.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.52% | 148.88% | -96.36% |
INDL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDL has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
INDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDL Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares | 1.60% | 1.42% | 2.79% | 1.65% | 0.09% | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.18% | 0.31% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDL and INTW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to INDL (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDL dropped -95.67% vs INTW's -60.58%.
On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs -24.89% for INDL. On fees, INDL is cheaper at 1.33% per year. On volatility, INDL has been the lower-risk option at 9.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs -24.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDL is cheaper with a 1.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
INDL has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for INDL and 1.50% for INTW.
INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDL and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer