PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDL vs. FAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDL vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDL achieves a -25.58% return, which is significantly lower than FAS's -17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, INDL has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of -0.38%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 19.91% annualized return.


INDL

1D
1.64%
1M
-9.42%
YTD
-25.58%
6M
-23.73%
1Y
-31.70%
3Y*
-0.21%
5Y*
-3.12%
10Y*
-0.38%

FAS

1D
2.86%
1M
6.03%
YTD
-17.44%
6M
-9.85%
1Y
-3.37%
3Y*
36.76%
5Y*
6.62%
10Y*
19.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDL vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INDL
Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares
-25.58%-3.21%7.56%26.06%-22.88%40.26%-36.43%3.15%-34.29%127.98%
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-17.44%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%

Correlation

The correlation between INDL and FAS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between INDL and FAS has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

INDL vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDL
FAS

Financial Services

28.3%
98.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Industrials

10.3%
0.2%

Energy

9.4%

-

Basic Materials

8.6%

-

Technology

8.2%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Healthcare

6.1%

-

Communication Services

4.6%

-

Utilities

4.5%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Financial Services

INDL
28.3%
FAS
98.0%

Consumer Cyclical

INDL
12.4%
FAS

-

Industrials

INDL
10.3%
FAS
0.2%

Energy

INDL
9.4%
FAS

-

Basic Materials

INDL
8.6%
FAS

-

Technology

INDL
8.2%
FAS
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

INDL
6.3%
FAS

-

Healthcare

INDL
6.1%
FAS

-

Communication Services

INDL
4.6%
FAS

-

Utilities

INDL
4.5%
FAS

-

Real Estate

INDL
1.4%
FAS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDL vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDL
INDL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
INDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
INDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDL vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INDLFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.02

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.08

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.76

-0.19

-1.57

INDL vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDL Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDL and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INDLFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

-0.08

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.12

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

0.33

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.17

-0.29

Drawdowns

INDL vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDL drawdown since its inception was -95.67%, roughly equal to the maximum FAS drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDL and FAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDLFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.67%

-91.61%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.82%

-40.88%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.64%

-43.10%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.64%

-66.88%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.96%

-85.99%

-5.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.05%

-24.24%

-54.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.35%

-31.12%

-35.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.02%

17.79%

+0.23%

Volatility

INDL vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares (INDL) is 10.14%, while Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that INDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDLFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

12.33%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.65%

33.34%

-7.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.56%

43.37%

-13.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.61%

55.59%

-24.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.72%

61.35%

-8.63%

INDL vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDL has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDL vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

INDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than FAS's 10.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
10.10%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%
INDL
Direxion Daily India Bull 3x Shares
1.69%1.42%2.79%1.65%0.09%2.35%0.00%0.68%0.18%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDL and FAS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAS has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to INDL (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDL dropped -95.67% vs FAS's -91.61%.

On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 19.91% vs -0.38% for INDL. On fees, FAS is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, INDL has been the lower-risk option at 10.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 19.91% return vs -0.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FAS is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for INDL.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 10.10%, compared with 1.69% for INDL.

INDL tracks Indus India Index (300%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.33% for INDL and 1.00% for FAS.

FAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDL and FAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer