INDH vs. GLIN

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

INDH (WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund) and GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) are both India Equities funds - INDH tracks the WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Index while GLIN tracks the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, INDH returned -5.01% vs -2.94% for GLIN. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDH charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for GLIN.

Performance

INDH vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDH achieves a -7.55% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN's -1.71% return.

INDH

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: -6.06%
• YTD: -7.55%
• 1Y: -5.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLIN

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: -0.44%
• YTD: -1.71%
• 1Y: -2.94%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: 4.11%
• 10Y*: 1.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDH vs. GLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund	-7.55%	6.76%	5.03%
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	-1.71%	-5.47%	7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between INDH and GLIN is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2024	0.74

The correlation between INDH and GLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

INDH vs. GLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INDH	GLIN
Financial Services	23.1%	35.2%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	14.6%
Energy	12.6%	2.1%
Technology	10.1%	2.0%
Basic Materials	9.1%	8.2%
Industrials	7.9%	21.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	0.6%
Healthcare	5.8%	7.9%
Utilities	5.7%	3.6%
Communication Services	4.8%	5.1%
Real Estate	0.4%	0.0%

Return for Risk

INDH vs. GLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDH

INDH Risk / Return Rank: 6
INDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
INDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
INDH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
INDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
INDH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GLIN

GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 7
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDH vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INDH	GLIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	-0.16	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	-0.11	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	0.99	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.39	-0.17	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.94	-0.56	-0.38

INDH vs. GLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDH Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the GLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDH and GLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INDH vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDH drawdown since its inception was -15.05%, smaller than the maximum GLIN drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDH and GLIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDH	GLIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.05%	-79.36%	+64.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.94%	-17.26%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.61%	-44.13%	+34.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-50.91%	+45.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.36%	5.24%	+0.12%

Volatility

INDH vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) is 3.36%, while VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that INDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDH	GLIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	5.79%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	15.74%	-3.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.30%	18.22%	-4.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.32%	18.35%	-4.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.32%	23.64%	-9.32%

INDH vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDH has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDH vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison

INDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than GLIN's 0.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	0.86%	0.84%	3.58%	0.96%	1.70%	0.00%	0.24%	1.42%	0.12%	0.10%	1.39%	3.11%
INDH WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund	5.68%	5.25%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDH and GLIN in my portfolio?

INDH and GLIN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDH or GLIN?

GLIN has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to INDH (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDH dropped -15.05% vs GLIN's -79.36%.

Which ETF is better, INDH or GLIN?

On 1-year performance, GLIN leads with -2.94% vs -5.01% for INDH. On fees, INDH is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, INDH has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INDH or GLIN?

Over the 1-year period, GLIN has performed better with a -2.94% return vs -5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDH or GLIN?

INDH is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDH or GLIN?

INDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 0.86% for GLIN.

What is the main difference between INDH and GLIN?

INDH tracks WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Index, while GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for INDH and 0.82% for GLIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.