PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDF vs. FDIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDF vs. FDIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


INDF

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDIQ

1D
1.28%
1M
4.09%
6M
10.01%
YTD
16.09%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
7.46%
10Y*
8.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDF vs. FDIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
INDF
Nifty India Financials ETF
0.00%8.17%6.32%19.86%-5.28%11.95%24.44%
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
16.09%6.32%12.76%-0.84%-7.23%36.05%33.49%

Correlation

The correlation between INDF and FDIQ is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2020

0.31

The correlation between INDF and FDIQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDF vs. FDIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FDIQ
FDIQ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FDIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDF vs. FDIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nifty India Financials ETF (INDF) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


INDFFDIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

INDF vs. FDIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

INDF vs. FDIQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDFFDIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

Volatility

INDF vs. FDIQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDFFDIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.98%

INDF vs. FDIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

INDF vs. FDIQ - Dividend Comparison

INDF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
2.15%2.66%2.69%2.89%2.51%2.04%2.92%2.44%2.45%1.59%1.50%1.92%
INDF
Nifty India Financials ETF
21.29%21.29%6.15%8.84%3.12%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDF and FDIQ have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDIQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDIQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INDF.

INDF has the higher dividend yield at 21.29%, compared with 2.15% for FDIQ.

INDF tracks Nifty Financial Services 25/50 Index, while FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INDF and 0.35% for FDIQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDF and FDIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer