INDE vs. MCHS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

INDE (Matthews India Active ETF) and MCHS (Matthews China Discovery Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while MCHS is a China Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, INDE returned -2.79% vs 73.11% for MCHS. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDE charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for MCHS.

Performance

INDE vs. MCHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDE achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than MCHS's 45.47% return.

INDE

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: -6.62%
• 6M: -6.67%
• 1Y: -2.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MCHS

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 45.47%
• 6M: 46.87%
• 1Y: 73.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDE vs. MCHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	-6.62%	2.39%	9.00%
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF	45.47%	31.19%	6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between INDE and MCHS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.13

INDE vs. MCHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INDE	MCHS
Financial Services	30.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	17.8%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	0.8%
Healthcare	7.2%	4.4%
Industrials	7.1%	32.9%
Technology	6.9%	31.5%
Communication Services	3.4%	1.2%
Energy	3.4%	3.9%
Basic Materials	3.0%	9.0%
Real Estate	-	3.7%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

INDE vs. MCHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDE

INDE Risk / Return Rank: 7
INDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
INDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
INDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
INDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
INDE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MCHS

MCHS Risk / Return Rank: 90
MCHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MCHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
MCHS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
MCHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MCHS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDE vs. MCHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INDE	MCHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	3.24	-3.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.13	4.05	-4.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.55	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	6.05	-6.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.39	18.25	-18.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INDE vs. MCHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDE Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the MCHS Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDE and MCHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INDE	MCHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	3.24	-3.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	1.23	-0.91

Drawdowns

INDE vs. MCHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDE drawdown since its inception was -22.89%, roughly equal to the maximum MCHS drawdown of -23.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDE and MCHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDE	MCHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.89%	-23.75%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.10%	-12.15%	-6.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.53%	-2.35%	-11.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-7.60%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.15%	4.02%	+3.13%

Volatility

INDE vs. MCHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) is 7.04%, while Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) has a volatility of 10.81%. This indicates that INDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDE	MCHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.04%	10.81%	-3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.51%	18.21%	-3.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.79%	22.75%	-5.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	28.22%	-11.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.56%	28.22%	-11.66%

INDE vs. MCHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHS's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDE vs. MCHS - Dividend Comparison

INDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than MCHS's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	1.88%	1.75%	0.56%
MCHS Matthews China Discovery Active ETF	2.45%	3.56%	5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDE and MCHS in my portfolio?

INDE and MCHS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDE or MCHS?

MCHS has higher volatility (10.81%) compared to INDE (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDE dropped -22.89% vs MCHS's -23.75%.

Which ETF is better, INDE or MCHS?

On 1-year performance, MCHS leads with 73.11% vs -2.79% for INDE. On fees, INDE is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, INDE has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INDE or MCHS?

Over the 1-year period, MCHS has performed better with a 73.11% return vs -2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDE or MCHS?

INDE is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for MCHS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDE or MCHS?

MCHS has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 1.88% for INDE.

What is the main difference between INDE and MCHS?

INDE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MCHS is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for INDE and 0.89% for MCHS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.