PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INDE vs. MCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INDE vs. MCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDE achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly lower than MCH's 3.98% return.


INDE

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-8.87%
6M
-8.36%
1Y
-5.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MCH

1D
-1.27%
1M
4.48%
YTD
3.98%
6M
3.57%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDE vs. MCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
INDE
Matthews India Active ETF
-8.87%2.39%10.95%8.18%
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
3.98%30.20%17.32%-8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between INDE and MCH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023

0.20

The correlation between INDE and MCH shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

INDE vs. MCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INDE
MCH

Financial Services

30.6%
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

17.8%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
0.6%

Healthcare

7.2%
5.5%

Industrials

7.1%
12.4%

Technology

6.9%
15.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
13.2%

Energy

3.4%
1.0%

Basic Materials

3.0%
9.5%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

INDE
30.6%
MCH
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

INDE
17.8%
MCH
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

INDE
8.2%
MCH
0.6%

Healthcare

INDE
7.2%
MCH
5.5%

Industrials

INDE
7.1%
MCH
12.4%

Technology

INDE
6.9%
MCH
15.0%

Communication Services

INDE
3.4%
MCH
13.2%

Energy

INDE
3.4%
MCH
1.0%

Basic Materials

INDE
3.0%
MCH
9.5%

Real Estate

INDE

-

MCH
2.7%

Utilities

INDE

-

MCH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INDE vs. MCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDE
INDE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
INDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
INDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

MCH
MCH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCH Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCH Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDE vs. MCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INDEMCHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.25

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

1.90

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.71

5.10

-5.81

INDE vs. MCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDE Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the MCH Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDE and MCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INDEMCHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

1.41

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.19

+0.07

Drawdowns

INDE vs. MCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDE drawdown since its inception was -22.89%, smaller than the maximum MCH drawdown of -40.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDE and MCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INDEMCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.89%

-40.53%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.10%

-15.05%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.61%

-3.41%

-12.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

-18.50%

+10.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

5.58%

+1.55%

Volatility

INDE vs. MCH - Volatility Comparison

Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INDEMCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

6.72%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

14.45%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.62%

20.18%

-3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

29.53%

-13.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

29.53%

-13.02%

INDE vs. MCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INDE and MCH have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

INDE vs. MCH - Dividend Comparison

INDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than MCH's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
INDE
Matthews India Active ETF
1.93%1.75%0.56%0.00%
MCH
Matthews China Active ETF
1.69%1.76%1.31%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


INDE and MCH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDE has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to MCH (6.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDE dropped -22.89% vs MCH's -40.53%.

On 1-year performance, MCH leads with 28.39% vs -5.01% for INDE. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MCH has performed better with a 28.39% return vs -5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INDE and MCH have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

INDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.69% for MCH.

INDE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MCH is China Equities.

MCH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INDE and MCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer