INDE vs. GLIN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

INDE (Matthews India Active ETF) and GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. INDE is actively managed, while GLIN is passively managed. Over the past year, INDE returned -5.01% vs -4.43% for GLIN. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INDE charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for GLIN.

Performance

INDE vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INDE achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN's -3.75% return.

INDE

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: -8.87%
• 6M: -8.36%
• 1Y: -5.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLIN

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: -3.75%
• 6M: -1.14%
• 1Y: -4.43%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: 4.57%
• 10Y*: 2.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INDE vs. GLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	-8.87%	2.39%	10.95%	8.18%
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	-3.75%	-5.47%	15.64%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between INDE and GLIN is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023	0.82

The correlation between INDE and GLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

INDE vs. GLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INDE	GLIN
Financial Services	30.6%	35.5%
Consumer Cyclical	17.8%	14.2%
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	0.5%
Healthcare	7.2%	8.4%
Industrials	7.1%	20.5%
Technology	6.9%	1.9%
Communication Services	3.4%	5.2%
Energy	3.4%	2.3%
Basic Materials	3.0%	8.7%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	3.5%

Return for Risk

INDE vs. GLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INDE

INDE Risk / Return Rank: 6
INDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
INDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
INDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5
INDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
INDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6

GLIN

GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 6
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INDE vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INDE	GLIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.30	-0.26	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.33	-0.25	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.97	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	-0.24	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	-0.71	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INDE vs. GLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INDE Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is comparable to the GLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INDE and GLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INDE	GLIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.30	-0.26	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	-0.09	+0.36

Drawdowns

INDE vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INDE drawdown since its inception was -22.89%, smaller than the maximum GLIN drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDE and GLIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	INDE	GLIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.89%	-79.36%	+56.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.10%	-18.56%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.61%	-45.29%	+29.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-50.97%	+43.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.13%	6.28%	+0.85%

Volatility

INDE vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison

Matthews India Active ETF (INDE) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INDE	GLIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	6.70%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.33%	15.21%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.62%	17.48%	-0.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	18.18%	-1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	23.68%	-7.17%

INDE vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

INDE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

INDE vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison

INDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than GLIN's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF	0.88%	0.84%	3.58%	0.96%	1.70%	0.00%	0.24%	1.42%	0.12%	0.10%	1.39%	3.11%
INDE Matthews India Active ETF	1.93%	1.75%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INDE and GLIN in my portfolio?

INDE and GLIN have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INDE or GLIN?

INDE has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to GLIN (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDE dropped -22.89% vs GLIN's -79.36%.

Which ETF is better, INDE or GLIN?

On 1-year performance, GLIN leads with -4.43% vs -5.01% for INDE. On fees, INDE is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INDE or GLIN?

Over the 1-year period, GLIN has performed better with a -4.43% return vs -5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INDE or GLIN?

INDE is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INDE or GLIN?

INDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.88% for GLIN.

What is the main difference between INDE and GLIN?

They also come from different issuers: Matthews and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for INDE and 0.82% for GLIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.