INDA vs. SMH
INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDA returned 7.09%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
INDA vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 7.09%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
INDA
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -10.58%
- 6M
- -9.05%
- 1Y
- -10.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
INDA vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -10.58% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDA and SMH is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.43 |
The correlation between INDA and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDA vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDA
SMH
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INDA
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
INDA
SMH
-
Industrials
INDA
SMH
-
Energy
INDA
SMH
-
Basic Materials
INDA
SMH
-
Technology
INDA
SMH
Healthcare
INDA
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
INDA
SMH
-
Communication Services
INDA
SMH
-
Utilities
INDA
SMH
-
Real Estate
INDA
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDA vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
INDA
SMH
INDA vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.60 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 9.18 | -9.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 33.74 | -35.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDA vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -84.96% | +39.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.69% | -14.93% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -35.74% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.72% | -45.30% | +22.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -45.30% | +0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -2.81% | -14.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -41.04% | +31.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 4.06% | +4.03% |
Volatility
INDA vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) is 4.16%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that INDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDA | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 16.25% | -12.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 27.73% | -14.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 33.20% | -18.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 35.47% | -20.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 32.82% | -11.71% |
INDA vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDA vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDA and SMH have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to INDA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 7.09% for INDA. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDA and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer