INDA vs. KWEB
INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDA returned 7.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for KWEB. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. INDA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.
Performance
INDA vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -22.20% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has outperformed KWEB with an annualized return of 7.09%, while KWEB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.12% annualized return.
INDA
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -10.58%
- 6M
- -9.05%
- 1Y
- -10.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
KWEB
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- YTD
- -22.20%
- 6M
- -23.82%
- 1Y
- -17.34%
- 3Y*
- 1.28%
- 5Y*
- -14.40%
- 10Y*
- 0.12%
INDA vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -10.58% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -22.20% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 58.23% | 29.92% | -33.80% | 69.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDA and KWEB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.40 |
The correlation between INDA and KWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDA vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDA
KWEB
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
INDA
KWEB
Consumer Cyclical
INDA
KWEB
Industrials
INDA
KWEB
Energy
INDA
KWEB
-
Basic Materials
INDA
KWEB
-
Technology
INDA
KWEB
Healthcare
INDA
KWEB
Consumer Defensive
INDA
KWEB
Communication Services
INDA
KWEB
Utilities
INDA
KWEB
-
Real Estate
INDA
KWEB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDA vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank
INDA
KWEB
INDA vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDA | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.90 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.55 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | -1.09 | -0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDA vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and KWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDA | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -80.92% | +35.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.69% | -35.46% | +16.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -35.46% | +12.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.72% | -72.17% | +49.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -80.92% | +35.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -69.36% | +51.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -35.30% | +25.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 17.80% | -9.71% |
Volatility
INDA vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) is 4.16%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that INDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDA | KWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 9.39% | -5.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 20.21% | -7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.79% | 27.20% | -12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 47.66% | -32.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 39.98% | -18.87% |
INDA vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDA vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 7.91% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDA and KWEB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KWEB has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to INDA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs KWEB's -80.92%.
On 10-year performance, INDA leads with 7.09% vs 0.12% for KWEB. On fees, INDA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, INDA has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
INDA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.70% for KWEB.
KWEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDA and KWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer