INDA vs. AAXJ
INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) and AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INDA is a India Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index, while AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, INDA returned 6.55%/yr vs 8.98%/yr for AAXJ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INDA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AAXJ.
Performance
INDA vs. AAXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INDA achieves a -9.73% return, which is significantly lower than AAXJ's 20.52% return. Over the past 10 years, INDA has underperformed AAXJ with an annualized return of 6.55%, while AAXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.98% annualized return.
INDA
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 1Y
- -11.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
AAXJ
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 1Y
- 37.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
INDA vs. AAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -9.73% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 20.52% | 31.53% | 10.41% | 4.79% | -20.35% | -5.73% | 23.35% | 17.93% | -15.04% | 41.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between INDA and AAXJ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.65 |
The correlation between INDA and AAXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
INDA vs. AAXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INDA
AAXJ
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
INDA
AAXJ
Consumer Cyclical
INDA
AAXJ
Industrials
INDA
AAXJ
Energy
INDA
AAXJ
Basic Materials
INDA
AAXJ
Technology
INDA
AAXJ
Healthcare
INDA
AAXJ
Consumer Defensive
INDA
AAXJ
Communication Services
INDA
AAXJ
Utilities
INDA
AAXJ
Real Estate
INDA
AAXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INDA vs. AAXJ — Risk / Return Rank
INDA
AAXJ
INDA vs. AAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INDA | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.30 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 2.75 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 9.31 | -10.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INDA vs. AAXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INDA drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum AAXJ drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INDA and AAXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INDA | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -49.37% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -13.66% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -19.74% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.72% | -38.91% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -44.52% | -0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.99% | -9.97% | -7.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -13.98% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 4.02% | +3.90% |
Volatility
INDA vs. AAXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) is 4.48%, while iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that INDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INDA | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 11.97% | -7.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 22.14% | -9.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 24.32% | -9.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 20.82% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 20.58% | +0.48% |
INDA vs. AAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
INDA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than AAXJ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
INDA vs. AAXJ - Dividend Comparison
INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.38% | 1.81% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.74% | 2.21% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 2.44% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INDA and AAXJ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAXJ has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to INDA (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INDA dropped -45.07% vs AAXJ's -49.37%.
On 10-year performance, AAXJ leads with 8.98% vs 6.55% for INDA. On fees, AAXJ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AAXJ has performed better with a 8.98% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAXJ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
AAXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
INDA is categorized as India Equities, while AAXJ is Asia Pacific Equities. INDA tracks MSCI India Index, while AAXJ tracks MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for INDA and 0.68% for AAXJ.
AAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INDA and AAXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer