IND vs. GLIN
IND (Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF) and GLIN (VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF) are both India Equities funds - IND tracks the Nifty 500 Index while GLIN tracks the MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IND charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for GLIN.
Performance
IND vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IND achieves a -8.33% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN's -2.47% return.
IND
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- -8.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLIN
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 1Y
- -4.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.44%
IND vs. GLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IND Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF | -8.33% | -0.34% |
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | -2.47% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between IND and GLIN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IND vs. GLIN — Risk / Return Rank
IND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GLIN
IND vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF (IND) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IND | GLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IND vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IND drawdown since its inception was -18.75%, smaller than the maximum GLIN drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IND and GLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IND | GLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.75% | -79.36% | +60.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.52% | -44.56% | +35.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -50.90% | +43.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.27% | — |
Volatility
IND vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IND | GLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.11% | 18.24% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 18.35% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 23.64% | -4.53% |
IND vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IND has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
IND vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison
IND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than GLIN's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIN VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF | 0.86% | 0.84% | 3.58% | 0.96% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.42% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 1.39% | 3.11% |
IND Xtrackers Nifty 500 India ETF | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IND and GLIN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IND is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IND is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for GLIN.
GLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.34% for IND.
IND tracks Nifty 500 Index, while GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IND and 0.82% for GLIN.
Find the right allocation for IND and GLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer