INCO vs. NDIA
INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) and NDIA (Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF) are both India Equities funds. INCO is passively managed, while NDIA is actively managed. Over the past year, INCO returned -8.78% vs -9.22% for NDIA. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. INCO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for NDIA.
Performance
INCO vs. NDIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCO achieves a -9.23% return, which is significantly lower than NDIA's -8.60% return.
INCO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- -9.23%
- 1Y
- -8.78%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
NDIA
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- -9.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INCO vs. NDIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -9.23% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 19.31% |
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF | -8.60% | 5.04% | 5.75% | 12.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCO and NDIA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between INCO and NDIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
INCO vs. NDIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCO
NDIA
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
INCO
NDIA
Consumer Defensive
INCO
NDIA
Healthcare
INCO
NDIA
Industrials
INCO
NDIA
Technology
INCO
NDIA
Basic Materials
INCO
-
NDIA
Communication Services
INCO
-
NDIA
Energy
INCO
-
NDIA
Financial Services
INCO
-
NDIA
Real Estate
INCO
-
NDIA
Utilities
INCO
-
NDIA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCO vs. NDIA — Risk / Return Rank
INCO
NDIA
INCO vs. NDIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) and Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| INCO | NDIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.92 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | -0.54 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | -1.26 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
INCO vs. NDIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCO drawdown since its inception was -47.69%, which is greater than NDIA's maximum drawdown of -22.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCO and NDIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCO | NDIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.69% | -22.05% | -25.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -17.09% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.70% | -15.24% | -7.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -7.43% | -3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.41% | 7.34% | +2.07% |
Volatility
INCO vs. NDIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) is 3.59%, while Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF (NDIA) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that INCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCO | NDIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 4.34% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.45% | 14.01% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 16.12% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 15.59% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.28% | 15.59% | +4.69% |
INCO vs. NDIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NDIA's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCO vs. NDIA - Dividend Comparison
INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NDIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
NDIA Global X Funds - Global X India Active ETF | 1.20% | 1.10% | 3.66% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCO and NDIA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDIA has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to INCO (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCO dropped -47.69% vs NDIA's -22.05%.
On 1-year performance, INCO leads with -8.78% vs -9.22% for NDIA. On fees, INCO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, INCO has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, INCO has performed better with a -8.78% return vs -9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for NDIA.
NDIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for INCO and 0.76% for NDIA.
INCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCO and NDIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer