PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INCE vs. QGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

INCE vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 2.19% return.


INCE

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*

QGRO

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.28%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.57%
1Y
10.81%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCE vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-10.26%
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
2.19%15.18%31.42%32.42%-24.54%24.57%37.99%35.09%-16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between INCE and QGRO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between INCE and QGRO has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

INCE vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
INCE
QGRO

Financial Services

10.5%
5.9%

Industrials

9.8%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
3.8%

Energy

8.1%
1.8%

Technology

7.6%
37.1%

Utilities

6.4%
0.9%

Basic Materials

4.5%
0.3%

Healthcare

4.3%
12.7%

Communication Services

2.6%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
12.0%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Financial Services

INCE
10.5%
QGRO
5.9%

Industrials

INCE
9.8%
QGRO
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

INCE
9.3%
QGRO
3.8%

Energy

INCE
8.1%
QGRO
1.8%

Technology

INCE
7.6%
QGRO
37.1%

Utilities

INCE
6.4%
QGRO
0.9%

Basic Materials

INCE
4.5%
QGRO
0.3%

Healthcare

INCE
4.3%
QGRO
12.7%

Communication Services

INCE
2.6%
QGRO
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

INCE
2.2%
QGRO
12.0%

Real Estate

INCE

-

QGRO
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INCE vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCE
INCE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRO
QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCE vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INCEQGRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

0.71

+2.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.73

1.08

+3.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.13

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

0.80

+4.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.83

2.69

+18.14

INCE vs. QGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCE Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is higher than the QGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCE and QGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INCEQGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

0.71

+2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.58

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.67

+0.17

Drawdowns

INCE vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, roughly equal to the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and QGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INCEQGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

-32.56%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.90%

-13.54%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

-23.82%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

-31.86%

+13.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.67%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-7.68%

+4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

4.03%

-2.73%

Volatility

INCE vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.02%, while American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INCEQGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

3.38%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

11.71%

-5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.32%

15.33%

-7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

21.06%

-7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

22.93%

-7.24%

INCE vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both INCE and QGRO have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Dividends

INCE vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison

INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than QGRO's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.19%0.25%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


INCE and QGRO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRO has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to INCE (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs QGRO's -32.56%.

On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 12.22% vs 11.11% for INCE. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INCE and QGRO have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.

INCE is categorized as Dividend, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and American Century.

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INCE and QGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer