INCE vs. QGRO
INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) and QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). INCE is actively managed, while QGRO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCE returned 11.11%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for QGRO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.29% expense ratio.
Performance
INCE vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 2.19% return.
INCE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 26.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
INCE vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 13.04% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -10.26% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.19% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCE and QGRO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between INCE and QGRO has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
INCE vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCE
QGRO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INCE
QGRO
Industrials
INCE
QGRO
Consumer Defensive
INCE
QGRO
Energy
INCE
QGRO
Technology
INCE
QGRO
Utilities
INCE
QGRO
Basic Materials
INCE
QGRO
Healthcare
INCE
QGRO
Communication Services
INCE
QGRO
Consumer Cyclical
INCE
QGRO
Real Estate
INCE
-
QGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCE vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank
INCE
QGRO
INCE vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INCE | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.26 | 0.71 | +2.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.73 | 1.08 | +3.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.13 | +0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | 0.80 | +4.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.83 | 2.69 | +18.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INCE | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26 | 0.71 | +2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.58 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.67 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
INCE vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, roughly equal to the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and QGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCE | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -32.56% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.90% | -13.54% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.01% | -23.82% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -31.86% | +13.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.67% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -7.68% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 4.03% | -2.73% |
Volatility
INCE vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.02%, while American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCE | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 3.38% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.96% | 11.71% | -5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.32% | 15.33% | -7.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 21.06% | -7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 22.93% | -7.24% |
INCE vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both INCE and QGRO have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Dividends
INCE vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison
INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than QGRO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.73% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCE and QGRO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to INCE (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs QGRO's -32.56%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 12.22% vs 11.11% for INCE. Both ETFs have the same 0.29% expense ratio. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INCE and QGRO have the same expense ratio: 0.29% per year.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
INCE is categorized as Dividend, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and American Century.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCE and QGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer