INCE vs. FLJP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) and FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. INCE is actively managed, while FLJP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCE returned 10.85%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for FLJP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJP.

Performance

INCE vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 12.00% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 15.09% return.

INCE

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 6M: 11.92%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 16.37%
• 5Y*: 10.85%
• 10Y*: —

FLJP

• 1D: -4.00%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 6M: 14.43%
• 1Y: 33.85%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INCE vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	12.00%	15.92%	10.70%	13.87%	-8.54%	23.36%	12.33%	32.72%	-2.14%	3.89%
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	15.09%	26.79%	6.99%	20.00%	-16.57%	0.99%	15.76%	18.99%	-14.01%	2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between INCE and FLJP is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.58

The correlation between INCE and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

INCE vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	INCE	FLJP
Industrials	16.2%	24.0%
Consumer Defensive	15.5%	4.1%
Energy	13.3%	0.9%
Utilities	12.6%	1.3%
Technology	10.5%	20.9%
Financial Services	9.5%	16.9%
Basic Materials	7.5%	4.7%
Healthcare	7.1%	5.8%
Communication Services	4.2%	5.9%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	12.1%
Real Estate	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

INCE vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INCE

INCE Risk / Return Rank: 89
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 53
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INCE vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	INCE	FLJP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.71	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	2.40	+1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.32	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	2.56	+2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.21	8.86	+9.35

INCE vs. FLJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INCE Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the FLJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INCE and FLJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

INCE vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJP drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and FLJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	INCE	FLJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.95%	-32.49%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.90%	-13.30%	+8.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.01%	-14.17%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.40%	-32.49%	+14.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-4.00%	+2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-9.32%	+6.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	3.83%	-2.51%

Volatility

INCE vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.76%, while Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INCE	FLJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	7.16%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.18%	16.00%	-9.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.46%	19.84%	-11.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.28%	17.95%	-4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	17.88%	-2.22%

INCE vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

INCE vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison

INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than FLJP's 3.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	3.83%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%	0.00%
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF	4.78%	4.71%	3.25%	1.75%	1.68%	1.41%	1.40%	1.31%	1.55%	1.44%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both INCE and FLJP in my portfolio?

INCE and FLJP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, INCE or FLJP?

FLJP has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to INCE (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs FLJP's -32.49%.

Which ETF is better, INCE or FLJP?

On 5-year performance, INCE leads with 10.85% vs 9.15% for FLJP. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, INCE or FLJP?

Over the 5-year period, INCE has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, INCE or FLJP?

FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for INCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, INCE or FLJP?

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.83% for FLJP.

What is the main difference between INCE and FLJP?

INCE is categorized as Dividend, while FLJP is Japan Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for INCE and 0.09% for FLJP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.