INCE vs. FLJP
INCE (Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF) and FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INCE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. INCE is actively managed, while FLJP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INCE returned 11.11%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for FLJP. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INCE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJP.
Performance
INCE vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INCE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 16.23% return.
INCE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 26.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 16.23%
- 6M
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 32.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- —
INCE vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 13.04% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 3.89% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 16.23% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between INCE and FLJP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.58 |
The correlation between INCE and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
INCE vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INCE
FLJP
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
INCE
FLJP
Industrials
INCE
FLJP
Consumer Defensive
INCE
FLJP
Energy
INCE
FLJP
Technology
INCE
FLJP
Utilities
INCE
FLJP
Basic Materials
INCE
FLJP
Healthcare
INCE
FLJP
Communication Services
INCE
FLJP
Consumer Cyclical
INCE
FLJP
Real Estate
INCE
-
FLJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INCE vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank
INCE
FLJP
INCE vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INCE | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.26 | 1.74 | +1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.73 | 2.50 | +2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.33 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | 2.47 | +3.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.83 | 8.62 | +12.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INCE | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26 | 1.74 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.51 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.45 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
INCE vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INCE drawdown since its inception was -33.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJP drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INCE and FLJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INCE | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.95% | -32.49% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.90% | -13.30% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.01% | -14.17% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -32.49% | +14.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.07% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -9.37% | +6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 3.80% | -2.50% |
Volatility
INCE vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is 2.02%, while Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that INCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INCE | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 4.11% | -2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.96% | 14.72% | -8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.32% | 18.92% | -10.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 17.75% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 17.79% | -2.10% |
INCE vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
INCE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
INCE vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison
INCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than FLJP's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.43% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
INCE Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF | 4.73% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INCE and FLJP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLJP has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to INCE (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INCE dropped -33.95% vs FLJP's -32.49%.
On 5-year performance, INCE leads with 11.11% vs 9.03% for FLJP. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, INCE has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for INCE.
INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.43% for FLJP.
INCE is categorized as Dividend, while FLJP is Japan Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for INCE and 0.09% for FLJP.
INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INCE and FLJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer